I think you're correct Romanic, I interpreted it erroneously first time. Though Chaotix' reasoning is strange, if we imprison two people at a time we are more likely to catch somebody, I would rather have two suspects than none.
Originally Posted by Double A: Or if you're a master at double-handed weapons, you could start out with a short sword AND an axe.
(Beserkers are awesome)
For some balance reasons, mainly due to the fact that Warriors can near enough do everything Rogues can in the games, I've made some distinctions between Rogues & Warriors:
Warriors wear heavier armour, can wield two-handed weapons and can use shields. Rogues wear lighter armour, can dual-wield and can use bows.
Originally Posted by Chaotix: We know Reenk was innocent.
There is a distinction in this game between innocents, who all pursue the same goal of neutralising the mafia, and neutrals, who pursue their own unique victory conditions; Reenk was not innocent... or he wouldn't have abandoned his old life to become a legionnaire. :P
I honestly think Mr This has given a rather fine roleclaim, that I find it wierd Chaotix won't let go of the idea that Mr This is a guilty person. Also Secura seemed to back up some of the things Mr This said?
Yes I am sorry for my minor participation, but I am on vacation, and that it sadly does not allow me to be active all of the time
Originally Posted by God Emperor: I honestly think Mr This has given a rather fine roleclaim, that I find it wierd Chaotix won't let go of the idea that Mr This is a guilty person.
Not entirely, he has been doing it in another game as well.
One thing that has struck me though, ArgTHIS is looking for a female guardian/noble. Chaotix is claiming female guardian/noble.
Originally Posted by Yaseikhaan: ... very well. Unvote: Chaotix
Vote: God Emperor
For now, anyways. I have a hunch that this deal with Arp is either accident or setup.
Set-up? Oh really. How do you figure that? Chaotix and Arpeg got together last night and said "Oh, I know what we'll do. There's nobody in prison, so let's skip our kill. Then one of us will run out there saying "OMG I was roleblocked don't kill me guyz I'm just looking to get married". Then the other will say "I roleblocked him! He's guilty, full role-reveal or the dwarf dies! Or I marry him, whichever. Oh, and we'll get Secura to back up the marriage story, too, that's the ticket."
Yeah, now there's a plausible plan.
Let's look at the other option: you randomly called Chaotix scummy yesterday without specifying why, then hit the jackpot today (or so you thought) when a dead innocent (well, non-mafia) fingered Chaotix as well. You got to say "yay, I was right!" and look all innocent and stuff. Then he turns out to be a roleblocker -- whoops. Back off fast and vote a lurker, but don't forget to over-justify your original vote along the way with this silly "setup" comment.
Yes it appears that mr this has being set up though there is a possiblty that he has not and we have got incredibly lucky I say contiune to role block him for now if the mafia really want to set him up let them waste more nights in doing so. I feel it is too early for the mafia to be pulling a dual bluff.
Chaotix explained why it is unlikely that Arpeg is being framed : Last night, the mafia didn't know about Chaotix's ability and thus could not refrain from killing to frame Arpeg on the basis that he would be in jail.
No, a frame by Chaotix himself. Refrain from the kill while roleblocking the previous day's top living suspect, then vote the suspect on the grounds there was no kill. Think that's what Khaan was getting at, anyway. Not so sure about Blackadder.
Originally Posted by Captain Blackadder: No I am saying that the mafia simply chose not to kill in an attempt to fram this and the role block is simply a coincidence.
How is a no-kill framing Arpeg if they didn't know he was being roleblocked?
Originally Posted by Captain Blackadder: No I am saying that the mafia simply chose not to kill in an attempt to fram this and the role block is simply a coincidence.
That's what doesn't make sense. There's no frame if no one is locked up or otherwise incapacitated; it's just an unexplained no-kill.
Sorry I am paying way too much attention to the other game and not this one reading back over the thread for some reason I thought that This was imprisoned last night. Disregard what I said earlier.
What if somebody was attacked and dodged the attack? Is that a possible explanation Secura?
I am not in favor of killing anybody given the seeming 'slowness' of this setup. There are numerous ways for power roles to resist attacks. So people aren't dying at such a rate that merits executions.
Vote God Emperor: 3 (Double A, Yaseikhaan, autolycus)
Imprison Chaotix: 3 (johnhughtom, Pinman, God Emperor)
Imprison ArpTHIS: 2 (ArpTHIS, Split)
Vote ArpTHIS: 2 (Chaotix, Khazaar)
I think Imprison Chaotix is a bad move. If some don't believe him, we can pick someone for him to roleblock and that person can tell us the next day if he did it or not. I don't think that's necessary though because of ArpTHIS's claim of being roleblocked.
If I have to Vote: God Emperor, whom I don't even know why we are voting for, to stop Chaotix from being imprisoned, then so be it.