
Originally Posted by
edyzmedieval
You are more or less advocating for the dumping of all useless jobs and make companies live off only with the people they really need and take it off from there. Well, let's say 50% people leave. In the next 3 months another 10% are added, so its 40% unemployment. Companies are perfect right now, with huge profits.
But there's one problem - what do you do with the 40%? Back in the Middle Ages, you would either kill them or starve them. Or even better, the Plague.
The thing is, the Plague was the single best disease ever done to humanity and it was the horrible impact that led to the Renaissance. Fewer people, more food, more money to them. Back then, there was no medicine. But now there is - and today killing people doesn't go well.
So what are you left with? Try and manage the economy as much as you can so it can come to 3-4% unemployment. Right now you can't just clear the pool without having a communist revolution or a downright civil war. And in the end, who is going to buy all of the goods and services that the companies produce once there is no money available for more than 40% of the population?
Your idea doesn't stand, economics is a complex social science and you need to balance. Going to the extremes will only destabilise the system and bring it to collapse.
Bookmarks