Wikileaks reveals identity of Afgan informants

**Fragony** · 07-31-2010, 16:34

Originally Posted by Skullheadhq

What's the difference between one innocent death and the other? That one killer wears a turban and one wears an uniform doesn't really matter for the family, now does it?

You are asking me

**Myrddraal** · 07-31-2010, 17:42

And NATO has not? But it's okay, the NATO only kills evil terrorists that want to destroy our freedom (or what's left of it) and they kill innocent soldiers and that is sooo sad because they have done nothing wrong.

This statement is childish on every level. Take a step back and look at the

you're posting.

What's the difference between one innocent death and the other? That one killer wears a turban and one wears an uniform doesn't really matter for the family, now does it?

Certainly not, and by the same standard, one innocent death does not justify another.

**Skullheadhq** · 07-31-2010, 18:48

Originally Posted by Myrddraal

Certainly not, and by the same standard, one innocent death does not justify another.

kuch...9/11...kuch

**Myrddraal** · 07-31-2010, 21:14

What? What are you trying to do, provoke me? You have no idea what my opinions are on 9/11, but I'll give you a hint, you're barking up the wrong tree, try something else. What on earth does 9/11 have to do with wikileaks? Are you saying that 9/11 justifies the release of informants details?

**Husar** · 08-01-2010, 01:51

I think he's trying to say that the Afghanistan and Iraq war are justified by 9/11 so we justify the deaths of innocents in those wars by the deaths of innocents in 9/11.

I do however disagree since the deaths of innocents are not the point of the wars and are usually not justified by 9/11 but apologized for by the people causing them, noone goes there and says it's okay to kill a few innocents because of 9/11.

**Hax** · 08-01-2010, 01:55

I think he's trying to say that the Afghanistan and Iraq war are justified by 9/11 so we justify the deaths of innocents in those wars by the deaths of innocents in 9/11.

I think he's being ironic (or trying to at least). How one would connect Iraq and 9/11 is something of a mystery to me.

**Skullheadhq** · 08-01-2010, 09:35

Originally Posted by Hax

How one would connect Iraq and 9/11 is something of a mystery to me.

But yet some stupids did, with devastating consequences.

Originally Posted by Washington Post 2004

President Bush, Vice President Cheney and other top administration officials have often asserted that there were extensive ties between Hussein's government and Osama bin Laden's terrorist network; earlier this year, Cheney said evidence of a link was "overwhelming [...] We have no credible evidence that Iraq and al Qaeda cooperated on attacks against the United States."

The finding challenges a belief held by large numbers of Americans about al Qaeda's ties to Hussein. According to a Harris poll in late April, a plurality of Americans, 49 percent to 36 percent, believe "clear evidence that Iraq was supporting al Qaeda has been found." [....] In September, Cheney said on NBC's "Meet the Press": "If we're successful in Iraq . . . then we will have struck a major blow right at the heart of the base, if you will, the geographic base of the terrorists who had us under assault now for many years, but most especially on 9/11."

But anyway, back to topic.