Wikileaks reveals identity of Afgan informants

[Vladimir]

So you mean to say that those defending Wikileaks are entirely partisan supporters of the Taliban, and that because Afgan informers help the Coalition, they deserve to die? I find it hard to believe that we have supporters of the Taliban posting in this topic. Is that the only way in which discussions of 9/11 and civilian casualties are relevant to the topic?

Good morning boys and girls. The word for today is:

Spoiler Alert, click show to read: 

Hyperbole

At the risk of repeating myself, I'd again like to ask.... If Wikileaks is to be believed, that they abhor secrecy and that their leak of massive numbers of classified documents was not done to weaken the NATO position, but to lead to openness in government....

1) Where is any hint of divulgence of information the Taleban might find harmful?
2) Why did they attempt to protect the identity of their source?

It seems to me the height of hypocricy to use "unnamed sources" to attempt to get more openness and disclosure in anything...

Maybe truth is so precious that she should always be attended by a bodyguard of lies? I can see them making a similar argument.