So you mean to say that those defending Wikileaks are entirely partisan supporters of the Taliban, and that because Afgan informers help the Coalition, they deserve to die? I find it hard to believe that we have supporters of the Taliban posting in this topic. Is that the only way in which discussions of 9/11 and civilian casualties are relevant to the topic?
Ok, so you mean that, but said less provocatively. I honestly don't see the link between civilian casualties and the revelation of informants names, unless you mean as some kind of justification, which is partisan.

That's the issue at hand. wikileaks screwed up and they have no excuses and nobody or nothing to hide behind.

The questions whether the war in Afhganistan is just or not, if Iraq was a mistake or not, if the Taleban are evil or not, if the US is evil or not, if anti-militarism is naive or not, if Bush looks more like Hitler than like Woody Woodpecker are attempts to divert attention away from the naked truth (oh, the irony) that wikileaks made an unforgivable mistake, are completely irrelevant and belong in seperate threads.
You just summed up the last three pages of text.