Fair enough, but you still have to justify why homosexuals shouldn't be treated as equal under the law as heterosexuals, though.Originally Posted by Rhyfelwyr
If you choose not to marry as an asexual you are not being denied a right anymore than a heterosexual who chooses not to marry is (I myself am one of the latter, FWIW). It's like saying someone doesn't have the right to have sex because he chooses to be abstinent. The right is there, they're just choosing not to use it.Originally Posted by Rhyfelwyr
No, it's not the same thing, or even like it. I am saying that asexuals have the right (or at the very least, should have the right) to marry anyone they want (provided the other party/ies agrees, of courseOriginally Posted by Rhyfelwyr
). That is not the same thing as saying that homosexuals can marry, but only with someone we approve of.
No. If the only reason you don't get married is because you choose not to, then you are not being discriminated against if someone else does. They can get married with whoever they want and then not have sex if they want. Choosing not to use your right, for whatever reason, doesn't mean that you're being discriminated against if someone else does.Originally Posted by Rhyfelwyr
--------
I don't want to go into this any further since it's a little off topic (my fault), but:
Cue the "Americuh is a christian nation!!!" nutjobs.Originally Posted by Rhyfelwyr
![]()
Bookmarks