The Catilinian Conspiracy [Concluded]

[Secura]

I'll fill the last spot, then.

[Captain Blackadder]

Let the Games begin this round will be a little longer as sending out the Pms took longer than expected.

For everyones information

Cicero is Csargo

Catiline is Saskai

Enjoy

[Diamondeye]

Is simply Tullianum: Sasaki too simple to work?

[Romanic]

Tullianum: Double A

No lurker policy! Who's interested to sign it?

Double A will be lurking, he's way too busy playing Civilizations V, and he dropped from games on TWC because of it. Is there a better time to lynch a lurker than day 1?

[Secura]

Double A will be lurking

Double A probably won't be playing mafia at all, expressing such a sentiment in the Zelda and Parasite games; your vote is for someone who will be inactive and essentially WOG'd rather than a lurker... this strikes me as something that you would know, yet you label him as a lurker.

Trying to appeal to everyone else to follow suit with your "anti-lurker crusade", particularly at such an early stage when 'no lynch' is usually more favourable and when we have a roster of generally active players in the game, makes me further question the motive behind your vote.

Tullianum: Romanic

[Romanic]

Double A probably won't be playing mafia at all, expressing such a sentiment in the Zelda and Parasite games; your vote is for someone who will be inactive and essentially WOG'd rather than a lurker... this strikes me as something that you would know, yet you label him as a lurker.

Trying to appeal to everyone else to follow suit with your "anti-lurker crusade", particularly at such an early stage when 'no lynch' is usually more favourable and when we have a roster of generally active players in the game, makes me further question the motive behind your vote.

Tullianum: Romanic

I have not seen any rule about WOGs, and Double A as a lurker or inactive means the same thing: He will be useless. Day 1 is a good day to lynch a lurker, proposing the same thing on Day 3 would be foolish as we will have more information to work with.

Considering how you recently spoke about inactive players, and games you've played having many of them, I'm surprised you are taking this easy route to lynch me for this idea.

[Secura]

I have not seen any rule about WOGs

WOGs are part-and-parcel of mafia, no host is going to leave a player inactive for the course of the game, either seeking replacement or just cracking the WOG... it doesn't need to be written down for a host to do it, it's usually a given.

Double A as a lurker or inactive means the same thing: he will be useless.

I can actually agree on this, but now that I think about it more, a replacement at this stage would probably be a better idea, t'isn't denying the town a vote just because someone's not playing.

Considering how you recently spoke about inactive players

Inactive players frustrate me to no end, you're right... I just don't see the point in using a lynch on one.

I'm surprised you are taking this easy route to lynch me for this idea.

It simply seemed a little off to me that someone would make such a suggestion at this stage of the game; as for my... sharp response to your vote, well I'm sick of being the player who has a bark worse than a bite and is seen as perhaps a bit of a pushover, so thought I'd press a little more.

I wasn't even going to sign up for any more games after Parasite/Inavi, which were meant to be my last, but someone twisted my arm so I stuck around a little longer; thought I may as well try a different approach to playing the game.

unTullianm, anyway.

[ULC]

Why are we voting for Tullianm instead of Exilium? I'd think it'd make more sense to exile those we suspect first - no need to kill those who may be innocent of sedition.

[Romanic]

Why are we voting for Tullianm instead of Exilium? I'd think it'd make more sense to exile those we suspect first - no need to kill those who may be innocent of sedition.

I agree... mostly. Double A should be lynched outright, but the other votes should be exile votes until we know more, specially Secura's vote

[ByzantineKnight]

Is simply Tullianum: Sasaki too simple to work?

*sigh* and here I was going to post "*insert obligatory Vote: Sasaki here*"

[White_eyes:D]

Is it just me? or does DE seem too scummy or just plain crazy?(I recall him saying he was mafia once for no reason other then attention)

Something about his comment stikes me as odd and forced.

I am willing to see what exilement does Vote Exilium:DE

[Askthepizzaguy]

That just sent me three messages to my inbox.

The Matrix has spoken. It's deja vu, therefore White_Eyes is actually an Agent.

However, as Neo, I don't fear you White_eyes. You get a pass because you have been absent for a while.


Cue accusing me...... now.

[Csargo]

Well...

[White_eyes:D]

Cue accusing me...... now.

Accusing ATPG=White_eyes:D lynch 99.9% of the time.

It's sad that I was right about it just as much too...

I want to see what exilement does...your one game where we had ninja duels got us all killed too fast(I still say it was worth it though)

[Askthepizzaguy]

Accusing ATPG=White_eyes:D lynch 99.9% of the time.

It's sad that I was right about it just as much too...

I want to see what exilement does...your one game where we had ninja duels got us all killed too fast(I still say it was worth it though)

So do I. Khaan as a ninja was too awesome to be contained within my head, so it exploded and I had to buy a new one at Sears. Halloween special, I am now orange in color and have crooked teeth and a candle for a brain.

[Beskar]

Spoiler Alert, click show to read: 

Cicero is Csargo

Catiline is Saskai

LOL. Csargo versus Sasaki, the re-match.

[autolycus]

I'm trying to persuade johnhughthom to play in my mini-mafia game on the .net. Maybe eliminating him in this game will increase the likelihood of him agreeing :).
Exilium:johnhughtom