Global Climate Disruption.

[gaelic cowboy]

I think the better way to reduce CO2 is to plant more trees and curb desertification.

I would hazard a guess there isnt enough room left for that ACIN in order to feed ourselves and curb CO2.

[Vladimir]

I would hazard a guess there isnt enough room left for that ACIN in order to feed ourselves and curb CO2.

True to an extent. Areas that can support greenery are not always suitable for agriculture. The problem is money, both in purchasing and planting.

More can be done but it would take an economy of scale to make a dent in the big picture.

[Fragony]

Store the stuff and use it for extended space travel. Hydrophonics baby!

[gaelic cowboy]

True to an extent. Areas that can support greenery are not always suitable for agriculture. The problem is money, both in purchasing and planting.

More can be done but it would take an economy of scale to make a dent in the big picture.

Marginal land is not always suitable for trees either and a good chunck of the global agricultural base was taken from the forest centuries ago.

If you ask me trees would merely slow the increase and not reduce ghg emmissions.

[Vladimir]

Marginal land is not always suitable for trees either and a good chunck of the global agricultural base was taken from the forest centuries ago.

If you ask me trees would merely slow the increase and not reduce ghg emmissions.

I intentionally avoided the word "trees." Anything that increases O2 production and biomass is a good thing to me.

[InsaneApache]

It is not surprising that President Obama is steering clear of any talk or action on global warming. The entire man-made global warming movement lay in shambles as the United Nations attempts to shift to the new environmental cause of biodiversity/species at the upcoming Earth Summit in Rio in June. Climate Depot will be attending. See: Sen. Inhofe may be joining Climate Depot at UN Rio Earth Summit in June! Inhofe: 'I think Marc Morano and I will probably go down to that one'

Formerly outspoken proponents of man-made climate fears are now openly admitting climate is not even the biggest environmental problem, let alone the biggest problem we face. See: Demoted: UN officially throws global warming under the bus: UN now says case for saving species 'more powerful than climate change' – May 21, 2010

http://www.climatedepot.com/a/16005/...climate-change

[Fragony]

I expected the next hoax would be about water shortages or particles of dust that will kill us all with death if we do not act right now really. Throw out the schoolbooks they are outdated, a lack of biodiversity is going to kill us all if we do not act right now. A lack of biodiversity will lead to mass starvations and and and WW3 and you know all kind of nasty stuff, if we do not act right now

[Papewaio]

That website is a news aggregator. Not a bad thing in itself, but it has an agenda and was helped put in place by Exxon.

" from 1998-2005, approximately 23% of the total ExxonMobil funding for the Committee for a Constructive Tomorrow was directed by ExxonMobil for climate change activities [p. 32]."

"ClimateDepot.com is the website of Committee for a Constructive Tomorrow employee Marc Morano"

Paid to spin. The most they can dig up is that biodiversity is a much greater threat then global warming.

So people are worried about global warming. They are worried about sea levels rising, coral reefs dieing, animals disappearing, extinction events. Generally one would term a species dieing out as a reduction in biodiversity. So the. Spin doctors best paid finger pointing is to restate the concerns of the global climate changers into a poor attempt at a flip flop.

Climate changers are worried about the end results of global change causing extinctions, resulting in less biodiversity.

I dont see how pointing out the result lessens the root cause.