What would be different if there was no police

[Husar]

Oh, so you've plucked the numbers out of thin air.

Fragony plucked his whole argument out of thin air, he keeps saying police are useless without any proof at all.

There is currently not one officer per 10 shops. If there's one per 60 shops the cost is the same.

Then his argument that it would be cheaper is simply not true and you'd have to wonder what exactly the benefits of the private security would be again?
Fragony seems to say police are never there when you need them and/because there are not enough of them.

Who protects the shopkeepers? That would be the national oversight. The same thing that stops the police from doing exactly that at the moment. Or are all current police instinctively honest (as a public service) and all future ones instinctively corrupt (as private)? Beginning to sound like a cracked record.

So the national oversight would also tell them how they have to conduct their training, what they can and what they cannot do and in the end you'd have the same thing as the police except it's all a for-profit thing that is paid by the communities instead of, well, the community? Where is the advantage of that, especially if they have to satisfy shareholder interests as well?