Results 1 to 30 of 217

Thread: Why can't Europe defend itself?

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1

    Default Re: Why can't Europe defend itself?

    Quote Originally Posted by a completely inoffensive name View Post
    Idk about how much Germany spent at home, I just know they didn't have the empire England and France did and didn't have to spend nearly the amount of money and effort like they did trying to keep control over 1/4th of the worlds land.
    Yeah, that fits in with "not profiting that much off of empire building". And I think germany became an economic powerhouse through industrializing.

    The problem in America wasn't getting the money, the problem was not giving them representation.
    The british trying to pull a profit or stop their losses (can't remember which) from the colonies was the driving force I'm pretty sure. America couldn't be represented...their interests were too separate from the british interests. They would have had no power in parliament even with representatives.

  2. #2

    Default Re: Why can't Europe defend itself?

    Quote Originally Posted by Sasaki Kojiro View Post
    Yeah, that fits in with "not profiting that much off of empire building". And I think germany became an economic powerhouse through industrializing.
    So again, I am just wondering if that consensus has answer for why Germany still lost even though it focused on itself. Is the general idea that if the war happened later, Germany would have surpassed Britain and France enough to defeat them?

    The british trying to pull a profit or stop their losses (can't remember which) from the colonies was the driving force I'm pretty sure. America couldn't be represented...their interests were too separate from the british interests. They would have had no power in parliament even with representatives.
    I don't get it, they would have no power in Parliament anyway but we can't have been represented because their different interests are going to mess up the direction Britain wanted to go in?


  3. #3

    Default Re: Why can't Europe defend itself?

    Quote Originally Posted by a completely inoffensive name View Post
    So again, I am just wondering if that consensus has answer for why Germany still lost even though it focused on itself. Is the general idea that if the war happened later, Germany would have surpassed Britain and France enough to defeat them?
    That consensus idea is about economic and monetary benefit. And it's two against one besides...

    I don't get it, they would have no power in Parliament anyway but we can't have been represented because their different interests are going to mess up the direction Britain wanted to go in?
    If they had given the US a few representatives they would not have had enough votes to repeal the taxes.

  4. #4

    Default Re: Why can't Europe defend itself?

    Quote Originally Posted by Sasaki Kojiro View Post
    That consensus idea is about economic and monetary benefit. And it's two against one besides...
    Well that's true. Either way you will have to excuse me that I am not just going to go along with your statement about this consensus without looking into it first. You are probably right though, but I'm not one to just run my mouth without having some knowledge/research on the subject.

    If they had given the US a few representatives they would not have had enough votes to repeal the taxes.
    So why deny them the votes? If they can't stop the taxes anyway then give them representatives and prevent a rebellion over no representation from breaking out.


  5. #5

    Default Re: Why can't Europe defend itself?

    Quote Originally Posted by a completely inoffensive name View Post
    Well that's true. Either way you will have to excuse me that I am not just going to go along with your statement about this consensus without looking into it first. You are probably right though, but I'm not one to just run my mouth without having some knowledge/research on the subject.
    I have only heard the theory in passing. Seems plausible though.


    So why deny them the votes? If they can't stop the taxes anyway then give them representatives and prevent a rebellion over no representation from breaking out.
    It wouldn't have prevented anything...they would have just (rightly) said that they weren't truly represented. Besides with the revolution you have that weird thing where the british became convinced that we were going to rebel so they clamped down and then we became convinced they were going to become tyrannical and acted rebellious and then that further convinced them etc and so on. Not the most logical time period.

  6. #6

    Default Re: Why can't Europe defend itself?

    Quote Originally Posted by Sasaki Kojiro View Post
    It wouldn't have prevented anything...they would have just (rightly) said that they weren't truly represented. Besides with the revolution you have that weird thing where the british became convinced that we were going to rebel so they clamped down and then we became convinced they were going to become tyrannical and acted rebellious and then that further convinced them etc and so on. Not the most logical time period.
    Well I think that is a bit extrapolating. I'm sure there would have been moderates who would have been pacified by the gesture and that the only ones left would have been the ones who were looking for a reason in the first place. Would those die hard people have rallied everyone anyway? Possibly. All I know is that there would have been no harm in giving them the representatives if it was a rebel or rebel situation and the benefit would have been the ability to keep taxing a rich region for while longer.


  7. #7
    master of the pwniverse Member Fragony's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    The EUSSR
    Posts
    30,680

    Default Re: Why can't Europe defend itself?

    Nukes kinda made standing army's absolete.

  8. #8
    Clan Takiyama Senior Member CBR's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Location
    Denmark
    Posts
    4,408

    Default Re: Why can't Europe defend itself?

    I don't think the industrial decline seen in Britain had much to do with its colonies. It seems more like the newcomers being more competitive and innovative and the old dog not being able to learn new tricks.

    The modern global economy is doing more importing/exporting than ever so we rely more on each other. The wildest China has done recently was to cut off Japan from some rare minerals and that lasted a few days IIRC. Among the greater powers no one is saber rattling like we saw a hundred years ago in Europe.

  9. #9
    Senior Member Senior Member gaelic cowboy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    mayo
    Posts
    4,833

    Default Re: Why can't Europe defend itself?

    Quote Originally Posted by CBR View Post
    I don't think the industrial decline seen in Britain had much to do with its colonies. It seems more like the newcomers being more competitive and innovative and the old dog not being able to learn new tricks.
    Indeed there is the real reason the colonies cost Britain money it was because of tarriffs levied against it's own colonies never mind France or Germany.


    No wonder it cost Britain money to have colonies they were trying to tax colonial industry to be more expensive than at home
    Last edited by gaelic cowboy; 10-13-2010 at 12:05.
    They slew him with poison afaid to meet him with the steel
    a gallant son of eireann was Owen Roe o'Neill.

    Internet is a bad place for info Gaelic Cowboy

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Single Sign On provided by vBSSO