Quote Originally Posted by Philipvs Vallindervs Calicvla View Post
Truth is a philosophical absolute, it exists in only one form, the correct one. Perception of truth is what you are talking about.
Yes.

Quote Originally Posted by Philipvs Vallindervs Calicvla View Post
If you don't believe in absolute truth then you flat out don't believe in Truth, the word has not meaning for you.
Quite. And again, where have I given you (and Sasaki) the impression I don't believe in absolute truth? My divergence from absolute truth to perceived truth is because cultural and social beliefs (perceived truths) are too complex/biased to be absolute.

Quote Originally Posted by Philipvs Vallindervs Calicvla View Post
In terms of multiculturalism this is important, without Absolute Truth any culture is equally valid in any circumstance provided they are considered beneficial to the one subscribing to them.

If you do believe in Absolute Truth then all cultures are measured against that Truth, or you best guess of what it is, and some are found more wanting than others.
Only if you measure cultures against each other. As I am at pains to explain, multiculturalism is not about measuring one culture or society against another. It is about mutual toleration based on understanding and negotiation.

Quote Originally Posted by Philipvs Vallindervs Calicvla View Post
From this we can see that Multiculturalism is litterally a proposition without value - so we can reject it as philosophically useless.
Whatever. If your purpose IS to blend cultures and identities into the best composite, then clearly multiculturalism is useless. My point is that that is not what multiculturalism is for -nor is it why its proponents like it!