Results 1 to 30 of 57

Thread: US slips to 49th in life expectancy

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1

    Default Re: US slips to 49th in life expectancy

    Quote Originally Posted by Louis VI the Fat View Post
    I blame your food.
    Food and murders and traffic accidents may cause the overall low ranking (so I don't see what that's supposed to show) but they say it doesn't explain the drop relative to other countries.

    We found that none of the prevailing excuses
    for the poor performance of the US health care
    system are likely to be valid. On the spending
    side, we found that the unusually high medical
    spending is associated with worsening, rather
    than improving, fifteen-year survival in two
    groups for whom medical care is probably im-
    portant.
    We speculate that the nature of our health care
    system—specifically, its reliance on unregulated
    fee-for-service and specialty care—may explain
    both the increased spending and the relative
    deterioration in survival that we observed. If
    so, meaningful reform may not only save money
    over the long term, it may also save lives.
    I don't understand this part though. What does what?

    It says our survival rate has increased ~3%. Canada and the UK went up 4%.

    Anyway I don't know why they quote the study as the source of the "49th" ranking since they just cite the ciaworldfactbook in the introduction.

    https://www.cia.gov/library/publicat.../2102rank.html

    we are .2 below denmark

    Not sure what to make of it all.

  2. #2

    Default Re: US slips to 49th in life expectancy

    Quote Originally Posted by Sasaki Kojiro View Post
    Food and murders and traffic accidents may cause the overall low ranking (so I don't see what that's supposed to show) but they say it doesn't explain the drop relative to other countries.



    I don't understand this part though. What does what?

    It says our survival rate has increased ~3%. Canada and the UK went up 4%.

    Anyway I don't know why they quote the study as the source of the "49th" ranking since they just cite the ciaworldfactbook in the introduction.

    https://www.cia.gov/library/publicat.../2102rank.html

    we are .2 below denmark

    Not sure what to make of it all.
    Whoops, you are right. Skimmed too much of the intro in an attempt to read the meat of the article. I guess it's really more of the two professors analyzing what this shift means and what the causes are. I will edit accordingly.

    EDIT: Also the paragraph you quoted from the article is saying that prevailing arguments about why our health care system isn't working (not enough money, unhealthy food etc..) don't hold up and that it is actually most likely the nature of our system (a for profit system) that is the most likely cause of decreasing trends in the health of the demographics they looked at.

    What you should make of it is that for as much as we spend, we are not #1; also it is not spending or food that is holding us back from better statistics according to the study. It's probably because our system quite frankly isn't socialist enough.
    Last edited by a completely inoffensive name; 10-19-2010 at 03:14.


  3. #3

    Default Re: US slips to 49th in life expectancy

    I wonder what caused australia's relative jump.

    Anyway, so the question is "why did we drop a relative 1%"?

    The conclusion of the article was what I didn't know what to make of. It suggests that the # of uninsured might be the culprit, then say that the RAND experiment found health care didn't have much effect on mortality, that it was just weeks for the population as a whole, then said that was uncertain, then said that investing in things other than medical care might be the best way to go, then said the profit stuff in our system might be decreasing health but said they had no idea how much (that part is speculation as they said acin).

  4. #4

    Default Re: US slips to 49th in life expectancy

    Quote Originally Posted by Sasaki Kojiro View Post
    I wonder what caused australia's relative jump.

    Anyway, so the question is "why did we drop a relative 1%"?

    The conclusion of the article was what I didn't know what to make of. It suggests that the # of uninsured might be the culprit, then say that the RAND experiment found health care didn't have much effect on mortality, that it was just weeks for the population as a whole, then said that was uncertain, then said that investing in things other than medical care might be the best way to go, then said the profit stuff in our system might be decreasing health but said they had no idea how much (that part is speculation as they said acin).
    Yeah it was speculation. Forgive me for reinforcing that speculation with my own personal bias.


  5. #5
    Devout worshipper of Bilious Member miotas's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Australia
    Posts
    2,035

    Default Re: US slips to 49th in life expectancy

    Or to look at it another way: "USA improves life rating for 24 countries!"

    - Four Horsemen of the Presence

  6. #6
    Senior Member Senior Member naut's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Posts
    9,103

    Default Re: US slips to 49th in life expectancy

    Quote Originally Posted by Sasaki Kojiro View Post
    I wonder what caused australia's relative jump.
    Less deaths from wrestling with crocodiles recently.
    #Hillary4prism

    BD:TW

    Some piously affirm: "The truth is such and such. I know! I see!"
    And hold that everything depends upon having the “right” religion.
    But when one really knows, one has no need of religion. - Mahavyuha Sutra

    Freedom necessarily involves risk. - Alan Watts

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Single Sign On provided by vBSSO