Star Wars: Fall of the Order [Concluded]

Vote: Ignoramuous

He should have gone earlier...

Originally Posted by Choxorn

I'm finding Joooray's actions to be strange, inexplicable, and ultimately guilty of every scumtell known to mafiakind.

And yet, I still want to lynch Ignoramus because we should have done so a long time ago. Also, Joooray's scumminess is so vast that I honestly don't believe any mafia could make that many mistakes all at the same time. He doesn't sound innocent, but he doesn't sound mafia either. In other words, he's so scummy, he's innocent.

That's interesting, I'd like to know what it scummy about it? Me trusting pever to coordinate my actions, me interpreting my results wrong or they being possibly redirected.
I'm honestly amazed as to people actually believing I would put myself on the line like this if I were Sith. Why would this even be a feasible Sith strategy? I cannot see any upside to it.

Originally Posted by Askthepizzaguy

You can quote investigation results, just like you can show pictures of your jedi, your lightsaber, or your force powers.

Thanks for clearing that up. The results on dc were:
dcmort: "Susceptible to the Dark Side, and you sense that the Dark Side is already present in this one."

I also got some interesting info from Atpg in my updated role pm I wanted to mention. My initial interpretation of the investigation being redirected might be wrong after all, as my results are not as clear as I thought they were. There were always two parts e.g. the result on Rebel Jeb said: "Not susceptible to the Dark Side, and you don't sense the Dark Side already present in this one", for a variation see the result above. Pizzamade my character realize last night, possible because I investigated dcmort twice, that susceptible to the Dark Side means that they are not Sith yet and if someone is not susceptible to the Dark Side, but the Dark Side is present, they are either Sith or highly resistant to the Dark Side.

I did not have this information before last night, if I had, I would have interpreted my results very differently! This is also for future reference for people the use Force Persuasion!

Originally Posted by Joooray

That's interesting, I'd like to know what it scummy about it? Me trusting pever to coordinate my actions, me interpreting my results wrong or they being possibly redirected.
I'm honestly amazed as to people actually believing I would put myself on the line like this if I were Sith. Why would this even be a feasible Sith strategy? I cannot see any upside to it.



Thanks for clearing that up. The results on dc were:
dcmort: "Susceptible to the Dark Side, and you sense that the Dark Side is already present in this one."

I also got some interesting info from Atpg in my updated role pm I wanted to mention. My initial interpretation of the investigation being redirected might be wrong after all, as my results are not as clear as I thought they were. There were always two parts e.g. the result on Rebel Jeb said: "Not susceptible to the Dark Side, and you don't sense the Dark Side already present in this one", for a variation see the result above. Pizzamade my character realize last night, possible because I investigated dcmort twice, that susceptible to the Dark Side means that they are not Sith yet and if someone is not susceptible to the Dark Side, but the Dark Side is present, they are either Sith or highly resistant to the Dark Side.

I did not have this information before last night, if I had, I would have interpreted my results very differently! This is also for future reference for people the use Force Persuasion!

I'm satisfied with this

Originally Posted by remake20

VOTE: remake

To keep from being WoGed.

Could you be any more suspicious? I will gladly help you on your way

Vote Remake

Fine, Joooray's off the hook for now.
unvote; vote: Sasaki Kojiro

Beskar, a confirmed Sith wishes for us to lynch Ignoramus. Why would Sith want us to lynch Sith?

Vote: Chaotix

Originally Posted by robbiecon

Beskar, a confirmed Sith wishes for us to lynch Ignoramus. Why would Sith want us to lynch Sith?

Don't be silly, you should know to just ignore him.

Originally Posted by Askthepizzaguy

First Place:

Ignoramus: (16) Zack, Choxorn, Khazaar, Death is yonder, ByzantineKnight, Double A, Joooray, Ironside, Nictel, Seon, Jarema, Nightbringer, Link, WEW, Autolycus, Renata

My name is TinCow, and I approve this message.

Originally Posted by Joooray

Stuff

So updated role-pm and now admitted you wasn't redirected? Hiding much?

Originally Posted by Nightbringer

a perfect bluff? unless that statement is also a bluff. what this really all comes down to is are you the type of man who would put the poison in his own cup, or in mine.

Incorrect, I am the type of person who would put the poison in both cups, so you will die either way. I however, built up a natural immunity to the poison, so I would survive the effects.

Vote: Chaotix

Meh, gone for 2 days for college crap and all this stuff happens. At least I'm not dead (yet).

Heh. I find it funny that people are voting for me solely because I'm the second/third place candidate and Sasaki did it first, otherwise giving no reason.

do you really? do you really FIND IT FUNNY?

I do.

Originally Posted by Sasaki Kojiro

do you really? do you really FIND IT FUNNY?

Umm... yes.

'Specially considering you haven't made a case for me outside of "he is scummy" for at least 3 rounds or so.

Why is it funny to you? What is that made you laugh while you were typing that first post?

Originally Posted by Chaotix

Umm... yes.

'Specially considering you haven't made a case for me outside of "he is scummy" for at least 3 rounds or so.

He has magical powers.

Lynch Sasaki...

Vote Cecil XIX the dude has 3 posts and no WOG. Nictel was also pretty much MIA until last 2 rounds.

Originally Posted by Sasaki Kojiro

Why is it funny to you? What is that made you laugh while you were typing that first post?

Oh, it was more funny as in "strange" than funny as in "made me laugh". (Your second post made me laugh.)

But I suppose it's the fact that you could be so dead set on lynching me and so wrong at the same time. And the fact that townies follow you blindly without you even giving a case.

Usually even ATPG has to give something resembling a wall of text to get people to follow him.

Okay Joooray, I will give you another round, your explanation seems reasonable. Unvote: Joooray Vote: Ignoramus

I will vote: Ignoramus and reserve my judgement on Jooray for later.

Whoa! I come back from a weekend away and find myself on a bandwagon again(surprise, surprise).

Jooray started this bandwagon on me in order to deflect suspicion. It's all too easy for him to get away with suspicious behaviour by playing the newbie card. Guys you are doing yourself a great disservice by lynching me, as you'll discover when my name is revealed. I am an important asset to the town, and a vote for me is a wasted vote this turn.

Vote: Jooray

I give you the 'Important Asset To The Town' card if you give me the 'How Many Times Have I Heard That One Before' card. Ok?

I've just realised that it is Jarema, not Jooray, who is the newbie here. My apologies. You'll probably not believe me now(if you ever did), but it would be of no use lynching me. Why would you lynch someone who lost a duel to a vigilante?

Originally Posted by Joooray

That's interesting, I'd like to know what it scummy about it? Me trusting pever to coordinate my actions, me interpreting my results wrong or they being possibly redirected.
I'm honestly amazed as to people actually believing I would put myself on the line like this if I were Sith. Why would this even be a feasible Sith strategy? I cannot see any upside to it.

That's exactly my point- your double scan and apparent knowledge of redirection abilities sounded like PIS, and some other actions seem scummy as well, but no Sith would do things like that- it's too stupidly risky, and the kind of thing that not even the best of mafia could possibly expect to get away with.

Anyway, your current explanation is valid, not that I ever thought you were Sith in the first place.

Originally Posted by Beskar

Incorrect, I am the type of person who would put the poison in both cups, so you will die either way. I however, built up a natural immunity to the poison, so I would survive the effects.

Heads you win, Tails we lose, eh? Well, I guess then the only course of action is to not play the game, and throw both cups in your face.

Originally Posted by Ignoramus

Guys you are doing yourself a great disservice by lynching me, as you'll discover when my name is revealed. I am an important asset to the town, and a vote for me is a wasted vote this turn.

Why would your name reveal your innocence? Or would it just reveal that you are, in fact, Darth "I-Screwed-Up-And-Now-I'm-Trying-To-Cover-My-Buttius"

Originally Posted by Ignoramus

You'll probably not believe me now(if you ever did), but it would be of no use lynching me. Why would you lynch someone who lost a duel to a vigilante?

When did you lose a duel to a vigilante?

It's possible he's referring to last night's write-up, as I can't think of another instance of the attacker winning and the defender remaining alive.

Originally Posted by Ignoramus

I've just realised that it is Jarema, not Jooray, who is the newbie here. My apologies. You'll probably not believe me now(if you ever did), but it would be of no use lynching me. Why would you lynch someone who lost a duel to a vigilante?

And why did you not mention this first?

First Place:

Ignoramus: (21) Zack, Choxorn, Khazaar, Death is yonder, ByzantineKnight, Double A, Joooray, Ironside, Nictel, Seon, Jarema, Nightbringer, Link, WEW, Autolycus, Renata, Yaseikhaan, Chaotix, slysnake, Diana Abnoba, Frozen in ice,

Second Place:

Chaotix: (5) Sasaki, Beefy, God Emperor, robbiecon, Antikingwarmancake88

Third Place:

Joooray: (2) pevergreen, Ignoramus
remake20: (2) landlubber, Captain Blackadder

Fourth Place:

Link: (1) Csargo
Frozen: (1) Psychonaut
Sasaki Kojiro (1) Diamondeye
Cecil XIX (1) Yaropolk


Abstain: remake20 (vote not bolded)

Originally Posted by Seon

And why did you not mention this first?

Because I haven't been online since Saturday afternoon Australian time. Why else would I allow a bandwagon to form on me again?