Yes they do, which is perfectly legal. Those crazy right wing nuts on the supreme court really made it hard for the democrats didnt they? The issue is relevance, is the surplus cash relevant to the current election process or democracy as a whole? The responsibility to make the ultimate decision is the voter and unless they are giving checks out for votes label me skeptical on its impact.
I mean 5000 ads against 3500 isnt the tipping point in this election if polls are to be believed, voters are angry at washington period. No amount of cash is going to make that go away until joe avarage see's light at the end of the tunnel.
Bookmarks