Iraq: 63 % of the casualties were civilians

**ELITEofWARMANGINGERYBREADMEN88** · 10-26-2010, 21:36

Bush didn't kill anyone people. The insurgents did.

**Tellos Athenaios** · 10-26-2010, 21:41

Originally Posted by AntiKingWarmanCake88

Bush didn't kill anyone people. The insurgents did.

Poor Bush what did he ever do to deserve this? Outrageous! I mean it's about the same as suggesting that Osama Bin Laden might have had anything to do with 9/11, or that Al-Zarqawi might bear any responsibility for dead Iraqi civillians! Next thing you know people might actually be held responsible for the consequences of their actions!

**Megas Methuselah** · 10-26-2010, 21:56

Originally Posted by Tellos Athenaios

Next thing you know people might actually be held responsible for the consequences of their actions!

Aaaah, child support!!! *runs away*

**Husar** · 10-27-2010, 00:30

Originally Posted by Megas Methuselah

Aaaah, child support!!! *runs away*

That state actually profits from more children in the long run, that's why it creates an incentive to get more.

To get back to the actual topic, Bush lied, and the American soldiers opened fire, and if they're not a bunch of overrated sissies they actually killed Iraqis.
I was actually a bit of a supporter of the war until it became painfully obvious that the whole WMD thing was a big lie, and I don't like being lied to, at all.
That there are insurgents is no big surprise when you start a war over a big lie and invade a country that wasn't very fond of you to begin with and where you previously betrayed some people.

**Devastatin Dave** · 10-27-2010, 02:16

Originally Posted by Husar

I was actually a bit of a supporter of the war until it became painfully obvious that the whole WMD thing was a big lie

Not according to wikilinks
http://www.nypost.com/p/news/interna...7pDf7AZ3RO9qnM

**Hax** · 10-27-2010, 02:22

Like killing a family, finding a bottle of rat poison, and then say the murder was justified because they may have used the bottle to kill little children in the neighbourhood.

**gaelic cowboy** · 10-27-2010, 02:28

Originally Posted by Devastatin Dave

Not according to wikilinks
http://www.nypost.com/p/news/interna...7pDf7AZ3RO9qnM

Absolute rubbish they would have paraded it on the news for all to see so that McCain could trounce O'Bama if anything I bet it is disinformation to discredit Wikileaks.

**Vladimir** · 10-27-2010, 04:20

Originally Posted by gaelic cowboy

Absolute rubbish they would have paraded it on the news for all to see so that McCain could trounce O'Bama if anything I bet it is disinformation to discredit Wikileaks.

Are you serious? Leaking tens of thousands of classified documents to discredit Wilikeaks?