Quote Originally Posted by Rhyfelwyr View Post
Right now it's about their actions. If they have not been violent, then they have been peaceful. Is there any evidence at all of them being violent? Is there any evidence of them making direct calls for violence?
Being peaceful is not being pacifistic as far as I'm aware. Whether those individuals are/were peaceful I do not know, there are certainly neo-nazis who chase immigrants down the street and beat them up. their message as a whole is not very compatible with pacifistic ideas I bet, they don't say it openly though because of laws against inciting hatred.

Quote Originally Posted by Rhyfelwyr View Post
If they have, ban them. If not, can't we just have one law for everybody?
The laws against using Nazi symbology, inciting hatred and trying to get rid of democracy ARE for everybody and AFAIK they're the ones mostly used against Nazis, but also hate-preaching imams and other organizations.

Quote Originally Posted by Rhyfelwyr View Post
I thought you guys learned 70 years ago that banning free speech to promote a national image isn't the best way to go about things.
If we learned that, it was more like 65 years ago, but we're not really banning free speech, we just dismantle evil organizations that break our laws and want to replace our democracy with a fascist dictatorship.