Quote Originally Posted by Husar View Post
Being peaceful is not being pacifistic as far as I'm aware. Whether those individuals are/were peaceful I do not know, there are certainly neo-nazis who chase immigrants down the street and beat them up. their message as a whole is not very compatible with pacifistic ideas I bet, they don't say it openly though because of laws against inciting hatred.
Where is the evidence that they beat immigrants up? They were charged because of the radio station, not violence.

And as you said yourself, they haven't openly incited violence and so they haven't broken the law, so...

Quote Originally Posted by Husar View Post
The laws against using Nazi symbology, inciting hatred and trying to get rid of democracy ARE for everybody and AFAIK they're the ones mostly used against Nazis, but also hate-preaching imams and other organizations.
As Gaelic's article said, the madrassas routinely deny the Holocaust, and nothing happens.

And OK the law against Nazi beliefs is for everyone, you could ban any specific belief then say it's fair since it applies to everyone, but that's not how things work.

Quote Originally Posted by Husar View Post
If we learned that, it was more like 65 years ago, but we're not really banning free speech, we just dismantle evil organizations that break our laws and want to replace our democracy with a fascist dictatorship.
Which is another way of saying that you are banning free speech.