
Originally Posted by
Captain Trek
I, for one, fail to see how the Panto/Machi dichotomy really matters anyway. Pantos and Machis have all but Identical stats (Machi's have one lower armour and one higher morale compared with Pantos, IIRC) and both have the AP axes, so even if you could go into Egypt as, say, Saba and recruit both Pantos and Machis, there would be very little point in doing so. As for Deuts (which do not have the AP axes), I, for one, can see no reason why a player who has access to levy phalanxes with AP axes would want some that don't have them. The reverse, of course, is not true (many Makedon and Eperios players would love to have access to their Deuts' eastern counterparts, I'm sure), but other than that, there is really no other good reason to make two (or all three) types of levy phalanx avaliable to a given faction, as the only advantage it would have would be to extremely slightly improve the position of two already strong factions that don't need buffing.
I'd be too much work for too little return, IMO...
Bookmarks