The reaction by Danny Alexander, the 'ginger' Chief Secretary to the Treasury is in:
Spoiler Alert, click show to read:
The reaction by Danny Alexander, the 'ginger' Chief Secretary to the Treasury is in:
Spoiler Alert, click show to read:
This topic is lost on me.
Especially the part where people actually cared about Harriet Harman other than to mock her stupidity in comments and actions.
Last edited by Beskar; 10-31-2010 at 04:33.
Days since the Apocalypse began
"We are living in space-age times but there's too many of us thinking with stone-age minds" | How to spot a Humanist
"Men of Quality do not fear Equality." | "Belief doesn't change facts. Facts, if you are reasonable, should change your beliefs."
Ginger rodent rofl sorry I have a weak spot for insults. But yeah it's pretty bad and illustrates how one-sided these people are. The left is an evil stepmother that really hates your guts for messing up her illusion of a perfect family, and boy can she get vicious.
Attitude is key https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7JhY7176qJs
Was it Daniel Hannen who recently wrote in the Guardian that the hatred of the "Progressive" Left was decidedly unprogreesive? Some of the comments he got were quite extraordinary. His conclusion was that the Left (rather like extreme religious sects) is a magnet for misanphropes who want to feel good about hating people.
I'll let you in on a little secret, the real reason I'm Right-Wing is I just can't get behind the hate-mo ngering of the Left.
If all you have offer is trolling verging on Racism I'll thank you to take a running jump out of my topic.
"If it wears trousers generally I don't pay attention."
[IMG]https://img197.imageshack.us/img197/4917/logoromans23pd.jpg[/IMG]
I can relate, these self-congratulating self-appointed morally superior gutmenschen are vicious like only females can be. If you tried explaining to her that it's nasty she won't be able to understand, she feels she has the right because she feels superior. Kinda funny how they become what they say they are against, the ubermensch.
or for another:
http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisf...m-of-tory-cuts
There are lots of inadequates in this world who, dimly aware of their own failings, attempt to shield themselves and their social circle from this truth by donning the mantle of a cause, usually one deemed universally to be a 'good' thing. By stridently adopting the arguments of the 'good' cause they hope to banish these blemishes from self and circle.
Young left-wing firebrands are almost a case study in this phenomenon, as being socially 'nice' to people is the ultimate 'good' cause and thus unconsciously or otherwise is perceived as the most potent social camouflage.
Our refusal to give credence to their ideas by reflecting the same hatred as they hold for us only makes that hatred more visceral.
Last edited by Furunculus; 10-31-2010 at 13:31.
Furunculus Maneuver: Adopt a highly logical position on a controversial subject where you cannot disagree with the merits of the proposal, only disagree with an opinion based on fundamental values. - Beskar
Oh dear.
For the sake of my newly restored equanimity chaps, let's address the core of Philipvs' opening post rather than post mindless insults aimed at whichever group one finds risible.
Thank you kindly.![]()
"If there is a sin against life, it consists not so much in despairing as in hoping for another life and in eluding the implacable grandeur of this one."
Albert Camus "Noces"
so very true:
http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisf...bes-europhiles
Furunculus Maneuver: Adopt a highly logical position on a controversial subject where you cannot disagree with the merits of the proposal, only disagree with an opinion based on fundamental values. - Beskar
This comment(along with much else in this thread) is so surreal it's bordering on the paranormal. Can someone verify that Philipvs hasn't been abducted by an alien probe-patrol and replaced by an impersonator?
Seriously, we all have the need from time to call someone ahead. I don't think anyone should care that strong language apparently offends weak, christian hearts.
Still maintain that crying on the pitch should warrant a 3 match ban
The prejudice against Red-haired people is an anti-Celtic racial slur going back to the Romans and more recently employed by the English against the Irish. Ginger jokes are basically racist, they poke fun at a charactaristic which is a racial marker, just like comments about Africans being "thicklipped" - even Shakespeare saw that one as racist.
Speak for yourself. Funnilly enough someone called me a "TorySeriously, we all have the need from time to call someone ahead. I don't think anyone should care that strong language apparently offends weak, christian hearts.
head on election night because I voted for our local (Tory) MP rather than the Lib-Dem incomer.
Your comments about ginger people are something I am just as sick of as comments against anyone not left-of-centre, or anyone not an atheist.
You could use a racial slur against a black person.
You couldn't get away with calling a left-winger evil.
You can't get away with pointing out Hitler and his ideaology were atheistic (when the Pope did this one the New Atheists screamed bloody murder, despite them mounting a months-long hate campaign against him in exactly that vein.)
I abhor double-standards and hypocricy.
"If it wears trousers generally I don't pay attention."
[IMG]https://img197.imageshack.us/img197/4917/logoromans23pd.jpg[/IMG]
Bookmarks