Ja Mata, Tosa.
The poorest man may in his cottage bid defiance to all the forces of the Crown. It may be frail; its roof may shake; the wind may blow through it; the storm may enter; the rain may enter; but the King of England cannot enter – all his force dares not cross the threshold of the ruined tenement! - William Pitt the Elder
Leftist insanity du jour, immigrant kids systematicaly get higher marks. Just because.
Owwwwwwwww the leftist church and their ideals
edit Wait, even equality isn't 100% equal, Turks get 0.6 on tops because they are Turkish, Marrocans only get 0.4 for free over Dutchies.
ES MUSS SEIN
Last edited by Fragony; 12-03-2010 at 10:21.
Frag - link or it doesn't exist.
Good point. This terrorist was an easily impressionable teenager. Even normal friends without an explicit agenda can turn an otherwise fine young man into an emo goth with a girly purse and black lipstick.I wonder how much of that was the FBI pushing him. It seems like a lot of their terror busts are where the FBI informant was the main force behind encouraging an attack.
Why doubt me, it's true. Link is Dutch but fine http://www.elsevier.mobi/pl/svt/si/e...5966/pa/159497 The crave got really bad
It's not about doubt, it is about sources.
Event X. Person A relates X to B. B relates A's version of X to C. C's version of X will now already be incomprehensible to those familiar with the original X.
Links in the Backroom to substantiate claims, or else there's no serious discussion.
Dutch is easy for anybody who's mastered English or German. Also, a link in any language is better than no links. (See: Tribesman)
Meanwhile I spend a fine fifteen minutes quickly reading through this article:
Moroccan pupils in the Netherlands get punished more by their teacher than white pupils:
http://tue.academia.edu/PerrydenBrok...ic_Backgrounds
Because the students are little pests? Yes, they are. But there are mechanisms at work why they should behave like that, why the teacher-pupil interaction should be the way it is. Dutch schools are far from culture neutral indeed.
Last edited by Louis VI the Fat; 12-03-2010 at 13:31.
and conservatives find it odd that liberals actively supported the mechanisms that encourage the propgation of extremist material in British schools, when no good liberal worth his salt believes in such nasty things themselves, or would approve of acquaintences who hold such views.
but somehow, when its somebody else outside your immediate circle, and it involves different coloured people, we can write it off as multi-culturalism!
Furunculus Maneuver: Adopt a highly logical position on a controversial subject where you cannot disagree with the merits of the proposal, only disagree with an opinion based on fundamental values. - Beskar
Like the first time an older French gentleman sedueced me with his giant
I agree
lulzNot our fault, they are less intelligent because of consistant inbreeding. Most are really really dumb, they are simply too stupid, the odd one that isn't a retard has great prospects.
Last edited by Strike For The South; 12-03-2010 at 20:33.
There, but for the grace of God, goes John Bradford
My aim, then, was to whip the rebels, to humble their pride, to follow them to their inmost recesses, and make them fear and dread us. Fear is the beginning of wisdom.
I am tired and sick of war. Its glory is all moonshine. It is only those who have neither fired a shot nor heard the shrieks and groans of the wounded who cry aloud for blood, for vengeance, for desolation.
Let me be very clear: Blatant racism is against forum rules.
If you wish to make a point against whole racial or national groups, at the very least back it up with research or statistics. Unsubstantiated generalisations are a sign of feeble thinking and unwelcome on this board when insulting entire groups.
Last edited by Banquo's Ghost; 12-05-2010 at 17:11.
"If there is a sin against life, it consists not so much in despairing as in hoping for another life and in eluding the implacable grandeur of this one."
Albert Camus "Noces"
Interestingly, the same logic that Muslim scholars use when it comes to analysing the Qur'an.You have gotten a source, learn Dutch if you want to read it
This space intentionally left blank.
Uuh, right. That doesn't explain why there are four different schools of jurisprudence.It's a shield of authority having to consult them, but it's pretty clear what it says.
This space intentionally left blank.
Days since the Apocalypse began
"We are living in space-age times but there's too many of us thinking with stone-age minds" | How to spot a Humanist
"Men of Quality do not fear Equality." | "Belief doesn't change facts. Facts, if you are reasonable, should change your beliefs."
It may be because I left a hash in there. It's now removed. Are things still pink?
"If there is a sin against life, it consists not so much in despairing as in hoping for another life and in eluding the implacable grandeur of this one."
Albert Camus "Noces"
Days since the Apocalypse began
"We are living in space-age times but there's too many of us thinking with stone-age minds" | How to spot a Humanist
"Men of Quality do not fear Equality." | "Belief doesn't change facts. Facts, if you are reasonable, should change your beliefs."
"Didn't want" is hardly a strong enough term. "Tried to torture and kill anyone who even suggested it for centuries" is more accurate.
![]()
An enemy that wishes to die for their country is the best sort to face - you both have the same aim in mind.
Science flies you to the moon, religion flies you into buildings.
"If you can't trust the local kleptocrat whom you installed by force and prop up with billions of annual dollars, who can you trust?" Lemur
If you're not a liberal when you're 25, you have no heart. If you're not a conservative by the time you're 35, you have no brain.
The best argument against democracy is a five minute talk with the average voter. Winston Churchill
Days since the Apocalypse began
"We are living in space-age times but there's too many of us thinking with stone-age minds" | How to spot a Humanist
"Men of Quality do not fear Equality." | "Belief doesn't change facts. Facts, if you are reasonable, should change your beliefs."
No that's bull, islam is both a stateform (well not really a state, but a political ideoligy) and a religion. Christianity is set in society, islam dictates society. Not a particular fan of either mind you, all religions are pretty much equal in the amount of patience I have for the religious, being somewhat less patient with muslims comes naturally cause they whine more.
Christianity doesn't set society, but it used to and it wasn't a power that was given up easily. Islam is more entrenched at the moment.
Muslims complain about being discriminated on the West. There was one on TV last night stating this. He was dressed in a cap, a long beard and wore robes. Of course the fact he's not bothered to integrate at all is not a factor of the discrimination... The other elephant in the room is the utter lack of equality of religions in so many Islamic countries. When other religions can convert people there in the way Muslims can over here then we can have a chat. As it stands you are in deep trouble possessing a bible.
![]()
An enemy that wishes to die for their country is the best sort to face - you both have the same aim in mind.
Science flies you to the moon, religion flies you into buildings.
"If you can't trust the local kleptocrat whom you installed by force and prop up with billions of annual dollars, who can you trust?" Lemur
If you're not a liberal when you're 25, you have no heart. If you're not a conservative by the time you're 35, you have no brain.
The best argument against democracy is a five minute talk with the average voter. Winston Churchill
No it isn't. Christianity was heavily dictating society (see: Inquisition and various references) and is very much political ideology, even having a big influence today (See: American politics). So anything you say Islam does, Christainity has done, at least historically. Same for the Hindu religion and many others.
It is just the natural traits of religion, and it is not just 'Islam', it is all religions. They are all used as means of control and power.
On other notes, many muslims are as religious as catholics I know. They just went through some service as a kid, and just call themselves Muslim/Catholic for the rest of their lives. But for some reason, you attack these as well just because of the label of 'Muslim'.
It is would be more correct to be attacking "aggressive religion"which includes all the bad bits of Islam, and all the bad bits from Christian Fundamentalism as well. All your examples are not just unique within Islam, they are elsewhere as well.
I am against all aggressive religions, I don't cherry pick the 'sensationalist pick of the hour' which Islam pretty much falls under since 9/11.
Days since the Apocalypse began
"We are living in space-age times but there's too many of us thinking with stone-age minds" | How to spot a Humanist
"Men of Quality do not fear Equality." | "Belief doesn't change facts. Facts, if you are reasonable, should change your beliefs."
Bookmarks