There are plenty of communists living in the west who'd like nothing more than to see western civilization crash and burn, just like muslim extremists do. But should that affect our laws?
I know a few people with deep connections with FARC living in Norway, taking advantage of our western civilization while hoping for a collapse of capitalism. but I don't think we should persecute or ban communism because of that. I still believe it is their right to engage in political debate, give their opinions and try to convince others that their opinions are correct.
Still maintain that crying on the pitch should warrant a 3 match ban
Who's talking about changing any law? When it comes to these schools in the uk, yes but only because of a loophole in Brittish law. In general, no.
edit: stay away from these FARC guys, they are dangerous. Really. Ideological hobbyism for Che groupies, but the real deal isn't kidding they are just as dangerous as the RAF
Last edited by Fragony; 12-07-2010 at 12:28.
An enemy that wishes to die for their country is the best sort to face - you both have the same aim in mind.
Science flies you to the moon, religion flies you into buildings.
"If you can't trust the local kleptocrat whom you installed by force and prop up with billions of annual dollars, who can you trust?" Lemur
If you're not a liberal when you're 25, you have no heart. If you're not a conservative by the time you're 35, you have no brain.
The best argument against democracy is a five minute talk with the average voter. Winston Churchill
agreed.
the aim should always be to naturalise an immigrant group, and if a particular group is resistant to naturalisation then they should be considered less desirable as a target immigrant group.
its called discrimination, and i'm all for it.
we have enough people who bitch and moan about britain already, without importing more.
Furunculus Maneuver: Adopt a highly logical position on a controversial subject where you cannot disagree with the merits of the proposal, only disagree with an opinion based on fundamental values. - Beskar
sure, from your citizens.
but it also a responsibility of the state to look to the well-being of its citizens, and that is not achieved by importing an additional bunch of people who will bitch and moan about being british.
a nations prime responsibility is to its own citizens, not justifying the unhappiness of 'natives' now because imports will become natives later.
Furunculus Maneuver: Adopt a highly logical position on a controversial subject where you cannot disagree with the merits of the proposal, only disagree with an opinion based on fundamental values. - Beskar
Furunculus Maneuver: Adopt a highly logical position on a controversial subject where you cannot disagree with the merits of the proposal, only disagree with an opinion based on fundamental values. - Beskar
Bookmarks