If I'm reading you correctly, you're saying that Britain would not be handing over it's sovereignty because it can just ignore the law. Is that really any better? If you sign something because you think it's unenforceable, what do you do if it becomes enforceable in the future? Or what if it's not clear if it's enforceable? In fact, this is the same logic that the south used to justify seceding from the US and which started the Civil War.
Bookmarks