Que?
Strawman? Character assassination?
I was quite clearly disagreeing with his position, not attacking him. The only reason he's mentioned by name is because he's been arguing that case more frequently than anyone else and was mentioned in that capacity by at least two posters, and only after that did I mention why I disagreed with his opinion on the issue. Maybe you haven't read most of the thread, I know it's quite long, but that has been the most prominent point of friction throughout it.
I don't really see a problem here, but whatever strikes your fancy...
Bookmarks