I was reading an article in The Times newspaper today (I'll try to quote a couple of the more relevant bits later if I find time) that was talking about the growing importance of Private Military Companies to the UK's war efforts abroad, especially in Afghanistan. This may seem a rather old topic, as PMC's were very prevalent in Iraq, but the most interesting assertion the author made was that the UK is now so reliant on these PMC's that it's possible it would be unable to fight a war without them! He also talks about the power these PMC's have and about their regulation (or lack thereof).
The most interesting point I drew from this article isn't the obvious one - does the UK's armed forces really need PMC's to achieve victory? Although I'm interested to hear whether fellow Orgahs believe this to be the case, I'm more interested to hear if you believe this trend towards PMC's marks a decline in the importance of the State and its monopoly on violence, with a return to the more mercenary based system seen in the past, especially in light of events in Libya and the mercanaries fighting there?
Bookmarks