So many vote changes. This is getting confusing.
So many vote changes. This is getting confusing.
here:Tally:
6 A.C.I.N. (TinCow, God Emperor, Captain Blackadder, Romanic, Pevergreen, Yarpolk)
5 Classical Hero (ATPG, YLC, Renata, Beskar, Winston Hughes)
4 AKWC88 (Robbiecon, Greyblades, Glenn, autolycus)
3 ATPG (Thefluffyone93, Sasaki, Rebel Jeb)
3 YLC (Choxorn, Ironside, ACIN)
3 Double A (Nightbringer, Classical Hero, Beefy187)
2 Glenn (dcmort93, woad&fangs)
2 Beskar (Secura, ByzantineKnight)
1 Seon (DeathisYonder)
1 Skooma (Diamondeye)
1 TinCow (Cecil XIX)
1 Khazaar (Khazaar)
1 Captain Blackadder (Frozen In Ice)
1 pevergreen (Insanious)
1 Beefy187 (Skooma Addict)
1 Winston Hughes (johnhughtom)
1 Sasaki Kojiro (Motep)
1 dcmort93 (Double A)
6 Abstain (ReenkR, Seon, Nictel, Csargo, landlubber, Jarema)
44/47 players having voted this round
Last edited by Greyblades; 12-29-2010 at 18:30.
I want ATPG and ACIN to stay alive... they add to my playing experience.
So, vote: Classical_hero
Unvote, Vote classical hero. you were the one who stole my present, were you?
Unvote, Vote: ACIN
I diagnose a severe case of casual scumminess, brought on by repeatedly getting away with it. The only cure is to lynch you until you start playing like a townie (or at least put some more effort into your scummy posting).
I hate to see you die early, c_h, but it's the only way you'll learn...![]()
Last edited by Winston Hughes; 12-29-2010 at 19:12.
What is scummy about his post(s)? It bothers me when this characterization which is almost utterly meaningless is dropped as a way to justify a vote while not really justifying it at all. Better to just post a vote with nothing else, this makes it seem that you are trying too hard.
Hmmm...to change or not to change....
My gut is telling me things, but my head is telling me things else. Should I listen to reason, or should I listen to feeling?
TosaInu shall never be forgotten.
Are you implying that the seriousness of the vote has anything to do with the ontological status of guilt of the person being voted for?
Or perhaps you are implying this current case on classical_hero should even be considered serious. I don't consider "he put suspicion on Atpg but didn't vote so he is inconsistent, now allow me to add a word a subset of which is 'scum' to further justify my actions"
I will indulge you and consider it serious if you believe so, and so my response to it will be that classical_hero is throwing suspicion based on someone's voting patterns. Not exactly my cup of tea but OK, I consider it better than endorsing an average restaurant like Outback Steakhouse which ACIN is doing (quality used to be better but now the food is worse and the waitresses are less pretty).
... those were MALE waiters...
Welcome back, Reenk.![]()
Unvote, Vote: Reenk Roink
I must say I agree with your post until the very end of it. There is a line, and insulting Outback crosses it.![]()
Bookmarks