Well until you write the new revisited manual on Mafia, once you write Vote: ingame you cannot legitimately do so again until writing Unvote; .
Well until you write the new revisited manual on Mafia, once you write Vote: ingame you cannot legitimately do so again until writing Unvote; .
There seems to be a lack of activity...
I think, looking at the tally and all previous posts, most would agree that a tie is most appropriate, so;
Unvote; Vote: Abstain
---------
8:00PM EST
8 AKWC88 (Robbiecon, Greyblades, autolycus, Diamondeye, Beskar, Sasaki, Winston Hughes, YLC)
8 A.C.I.N. (TinCow, God Emperor, Captain Blackadder, Romanic, Yaropolk, pevergreen, Reenk, Double A)
5 Classical Hero (Renata, ATPG, Seon, Rebel Jeb, Insanious)
3 Double A (Nightbringer, Classical Hero, Beefy187)
3 YLC (Choxorn, Ironside, A.C.I.N.)
2 ATPG (Thefluffyone93, Yaropolk)
2 Glenn (dcmort93, woad&fangs)
1 Seon (DeathisYonder)
1 TinCow (Cecil XIX)
1 Beskar (Secura, ByzantineKnight)
1 Khazaar (Khazaar)
1 Beefy187 (Skooma Addict)
1 Winston Hughes (johnhughtom)
1 Sasaki Kojiro (Motep)
1 ReenkRoink (Frozen in Ice)
5 Abstaining (Nictel, Csargo, landlubber, Jarema, Glenn)
44/47 players having voted this round
Last edited by PershsNhpios; 12-30-2010 at 02:01.
Glenn you edited your post which invalidates your vote. Which I believe means that Warman still has 9 votes to my 8. Since voting time is over, it looks like luck was on my side.
Can you show me a precedent of that excuse being allowed?
Perhaps the host can clear up two things;
Whether Jarema's vote will count, creating a tie, or whether my vote will, creating a tie, or if neither are legitimate - meaning AKWC88 is lynched.
Last edited by PershsNhpios; 12-30-2010 at 02:21.
"-You may NOT edit your vote out of a post. You may edit a post with a vote in it so long as the edit does not affect the vote"
The Rules (emphasis added)
Sorry A.C.I.N., if Glenn's tally is right, his editing the post won't matter.
Last edited by autolycus; 12-30-2010 at 02:23.
My game on Civfanatics could use a few more!: MNOTW XVII: The Cursed Blade!
I think that Jarema relatively new to this, so we can be a bit lenient towards him for the first few times.
I do agree that changing votes should always be done in a new post and not editted out, since we should know all the changes made by players.
It is a newer thing. I believe either 'khaan or GH started the "votes in edited posts don't count" thing. Most, if not all hosts follow that now.
edit: Looks like I should have actually read the rules to this game before I started. Thanks, autolycus!
Last edited by woad&fangs; 12-30-2010 at 02:25.
Why did the chicken cross the road?
So that its subjects will view it with admiration, as a chicken which has the daring and courage to boldly cross the road,
but also with fear, for whom among them has the strength to contend with such a paragon of avian virtue? In such a manner is the princely
chicken's dominion maintained. ~Machiavelli
My game on Civfanatics could use a few more!: MNOTW XVII: The Cursed Blade!
You posted while I was writing my post! I didn't know!
vote: autolycus
Dang it, looks like my vote gun is firing blanks. I'll get you next day, auto!
Why did the chicken cross the road?
So that its subjects will view it with admiration, as a chicken which has the daring and courage to boldly cross the road,
but also with fear, for whom among them has the strength to contend with such a paragon of avian virtue? In such a manner is the princely
chicken's dominion maintained. ~Machiavelli
Bookmarks