[Council of Villains] A State of Corruption [Concluded]

[PershsNhpios]

There seems to be a lack of activity...

I think, looking at the tally and all previous posts, most would agree that a tie is most appropriate, so;

Unvote; Vote: Abstain


---------

8:00PM EST

8 AKWC88 (Robbiecon, Greyblades, autolycus, Diamondeye, Beskar, Sasaki, Winston Hughes, YLC)

8 A.C.I.N. (TinCow, God Emperor, Captain Blackadder, Romanic, Yaropolk, pevergreen, Reenk, Double A)

5 Classical Hero (Renata, ATPG, Seon, Rebel Jeb, Insanious)

3 Double A (Nightbringer, Classical Hero, Beefy187)

3 YLC (Choxorn, Ironside, A.C.I.N.)

2 ATPG (Thefluffyone93, Yaropolk)

2 Glenn (dcmort93, woad&fangs)

1 Seon (DeathisYonder)

1 TinCow (Cecil XIX)

1 Beskar (Secura, ByzantineKnight)

1 Khazaar (Khazaar)

1 Beefy187 (Skooma Addict)

1 Winston Hughes (johnhughtom)

1 Sasaki Kojiro (Motep)

1 ReenkRoink (Frozen in Ice)

5 Abstaining (Nictel, Csargo, landlubber, Jarema, Glenn)


44/47 players having voted this round

[a completely inoffensive name]

Glenn you edited your post which invalidates your vote. Which I believe means that Warman still has 9 votes to my 8. Since voting time is over, it looks like luck was on my side.

[PershsNhpios]

Can you show me a precedent of that excuse being allowed?

Perhaps the host can clear up two things;

Whether Jarema's vote will count, creating a tie, or whether my vote will, creating a tie, or if neither are legitimate - meaning AKWC88 is lynched.

[a completely inoffensive name]

Can you show me a precedent of that excuse being allowed?

It's not an excuse, it's the rule. For someone who just nailed someone for not Unvoting before re-voting, why is it that when you fail to follow the rules it is something to just let go by?

[autolycus]

"-You may NOT edit your vote out of a post. You may edit a post with a vote in it so long as the edit does not affect the vote"
The Rules (emphasis added)
Sorry A.C.I.N., if Glenn's tally is right, his editing the post won't matter.

[a completely inoffensive name]

"-You may NOT edit your vote out of a post. You may edit a post with a vote in it so long as the edit does not affect the vote"
The Rules (emphasis added)
Sorry Warman, if Glenn's tally is right, his editing the post won't matter.

From what I have been told in previous mafia games by the mods, is that you don't know if the vote is changed when a post is buried 3 pages back (no is paying attention to keep track), so no editing should be allowed period. I have been called on this rule before.

[classical_hero]

I think that Jarema relatively new to this, so we can be a bit lenient towards him for the first few times.

I do agree that changing votes should always be done in a new post and not editted out, since we should know all the changes made by players.

[woad&fangs]

It is a newer thing. I believe either 'khaan or GH started the "votes in edited posts don't count" thing. Most, if not all hosts follow that now.
edit: Looks like I should have actually read the rules to this game before I started. Thanks, autolycus!

[autolycus]

It is a newer thing. I believe either 'khaan or GH started the "votes in edited posts don't count" thing. Most, if not all hosts follow that now.

The rules I quoted are Chaotix' ones on the first page of this thread. I think they're still accurate for this game :)

[a completely inoffensive name]

The rules I quoted are Chaotix' ones on the first page of this thread. I think they're still accurate for this game :)

[woad&fangs]

You posted while I was writing my post! I didn't know!
vote: autolycus

Dang it, looks like my vote gun is firing blanks. I'll get you next day, auto!

[Choxorn]

So... depending on how we count the votes, ACIN is lynched, or Warman is lynched, or there's a tie.

Did we get teleported to Florida and sent back to November 2000, and I just didn't notice?