Battlefield Bad Company 2

**Jolt** · 06-07-2011, 09:41

Originally Posted by Prussian to the Iron

I love it personally. I don't know how good it is on PC though.

But my advice? wait a few months. Battlefield 3 is out October 25th, and it looks AMAZING. i'm pre-ordering soon.

Bleh. Looks exactly like every other CoD that has appeared in the last 5 years.

**Alexander the Pretty Good** · 06-07-2011, 13:38

Originally Posted by Jolt

Bleh. Looks exactly like every other CoD that has appeared in the last 5 years.

Looks. It also looks like BF2 with a lot of shine applied. I trust them with the MP.

**Prussian to the Iron** · 06-07-2011, 19:46

Originally Posted by Jolt

Bleh. Looks exactly like every other CoD that has appeared in the last 5 years.

I definitely do not agree with this. Battlefield is nothing like CoD, except maybe the fact that you shoot people. The entire gameplay is different, and the fact that CoD hasn't changed since CoD 4 means that it's easy to contrast. The differences are glaring, not only gameplay wise, but graphically as well. MW3 looks nowhere close to the visual quality of BF3.

**Hooahguy** · 06-07-2011, 22:14

Originally Posted by Prussian to the Iron

I definitely do not agree with this. Battlefield is nothing like CoD, except maybe the fact that you shoot people. The entire gameplay is different, and the fact that CoD hasn't changed since CoD 4 means that it's easy to contrast. The differences are glaring, not only gameplay wise, but graphically as well. MW3 looks nowhere close to the visual quality of BF3.

Agreed 100%.

Im just missing the whole commander aspect that other BF games had.

**Prussian to the Iron** · 06-07-2011, 22:16

Originally Posted by Hooahguy

Agreed 100%.

Im just missing the whole commander aspect that other BF games had.

I wish I could really understand why everybody wants the commander so badly

**Hooahguy** · 06-07-2011, 22:33

Originally Posted by Prussian to the Iron

I wish I could really understand why everybody wants the commander so badly

Because it gives a grand strategical aspect to the game. I remember in BF2142, when we had a good commander that is, we would divide into squads and the commander would devise a strategy on how to win the match. He would be able to talk to squad commanders and give them orders. You really felt like you were part of a larger thing. In BC2 it was a bunch of squads running around trying to get to the objective.
In short, a commander makes things more organized.

**Prussian to the Iron** · 06-07-2011, 23:07

I think the squad leaders are going to be able to talk to eachother, but i'm not sure. it would be nice though, it would kind of eliminate the need for an official commander.

**Hooahguy** · 06-07-2011, 23:10

Originally Posted by Prussian to the Iron

I think the squad leaders are going to be able to talk to eachother, but i'm not sure. it would be nice though, it would kind of eliminate the need for an official commander.

No, you need someone who is removed from fighting the battle so they can concentrate on the strategy. Cant really concentrate on strategy very well if you are under fire...