South Park: Imaginationland [Concluded]

**Diamondeye** · 01-06-2011, 15:18

I'm still inclined to vote:God Emperor for the flinch yesterday, even if it was too late to be counted.

**God Emperor** · 01-06-2011, 16:23

Well I too am inclined to stick with my vote

Originally Posted by Diamondeye

But sure, you can choose to believe that I threw my D1 vote on my mafia partner so I would potentially need to retract it and cause a mess. It might work in large games; it doesn't in small ones.
I'll only apologize the switch if Auto turns up as mafia. Otherwise, my switch is perfectly legit.

Well yes, that is what I am accusing you for.. It doesn't sit well with me when people change their vote 10 minutes before deadline-- Although you make it sound absurd that I would believe you would cause a mess like that as a mafia, it's the exact same reason you use when voting for me :) - So I fail to see why you would use such an argument in your defense, when such reason is good enough for your offense.
I will vote for you for the moment. Vote: Diamondeye

although I think that people who changes their votes like that should be lynched, I would also empathize with a few more candidates being lined up for lynch

**Death is yonder** · 01-06-2011, 17:23

I think that it is likely that if DE was vote switching to save CB, he would have continued voting autolycus, rather than switch randomly to JHT. Unless he was trying to save auto then, but as he said, it would be rather weird if he voted his mafia partner just to switch out at the last moment.

On another note, I'm infinitely more curious about the number of kills considering that I remembered, and checked again:

3 Mafiosi, 2 murders per night.

I'm more inclined to:

Vote: Joooray

**ULC** · 01-06-2011, 19:02

Vote: Joooray

I am inclined to go after the lurkers right now due to the lack of a kill.

**Winston Hughes** · 01-06-2011, 19:20

vote: Death is yonder

Snarf

**Diamondeye** · 01-06-2011, 21:12

Originally Posted by God Emperor

Well yes, that is what I am accusing you for.. It doesn't sit well with me when people change their vote 10 minutes before deadline-- Although you make it sound absurd that I would believe you would cause a mess like that as a mafia, it's the exact same reason you use when voting for me :) - So I fail to see why you would use such an argument in your defense, when such reason is good enough for your offense.

The difference is that mine was an elaborate action to skew the tally; as I said, I hadn't seen the extra vote on CB, and I though I was effectively giving JHT the death kiss; if he was mafia, I'm sure it would provoke one of his scum buddies to try and save him (although voting CB would've been better than voting me, in that case).
You on the other hand reacted on it as I expected a potential scumpartner would have done. That's why I'm voting you. I can understand why people are voting me, but it's still a wrong move.

Originally Posted by Winston Hughes

Snarf

What.

**Winston Hughes** · 01-06-2011, 21:13

Originally Posted by Diamondeye

What.

Snarf

**johnhughthom** · 01-06-2011, 22:39

Originally Posted by Diamondeye

The difference is that mine was an elaborate action to skew the tally; as I said, I hadn't seen the extra vote on CB, and I though I was effectively giving JHT the death kiss; if he was mafia, I'm sure it would provoke one of his scum buddies to try and save him (although voting CB would've been better than voting me, in that case).
You on the other hand reacted on it as I expected a potential scumpartner would have done. That's why I'm voting you. I can understand why people are voting me, but it's still a wrong move.

What.

Exactly.

**God Emperor** · 01-07-2011, 08:05

Originally Posted by Diamondeye

The difference is that mine was an elaborate action to skew the tally; as I said, I hadn't seen the extra vote on CB, and I though I was effectively giving JHT the death kiss; if he was mafia, I'm sure it would provoke one of his scum buddies to try and save him (although voting CB would've been better than voting me, in that case).
You on the other hand reacted on it as I expected a potential scumpartner would have done. That's why I'm voting you. I can understand why people are voting me, but it's still a wrong move.

Your reasons doesn't sit well with me at all.. however to be fair with you, I don't know how to feel right now; your actions reminds me of those in council of villiant that just shifted their vote from Tincow to survive, which we spoke a bit about.
The case on Joooray is well spotted... As I think all save Joooray has been actively online, I think we are down to a 50% chance of him being scum.. which is ofc a very high percentage chance. However imo chances are equally good that Johnhughthom was scum - In which case, Diamondeye was really lucky.. Viewing the number of active people that happily join that bandwagon might suggest that it was JHT who was scum.. This is ofc just speculations, but worth a thought imo..
Anyway the best choice for today is to Vote: Joooray

**classical_hero** · 01-07-2011, 01:12

Originally Posted by YLC

I am inclined to go after the lurkers right now due to the lack of a kill.

Do we have any role blockers in this game? That could explain the lack of the other kill, but so does this, but there still was a kill so at least one mafia was active, so we should try for him first, I think.

**autolycus** · 01-07-2011, 04:35

The reason why I want to lynch an inactive, classical_hero, is not so much about the possibility of them being mafia, but more, strange as it sounds, to prevent the mafia from killing them. Since this is a game where scum aren't revealed on death, the only people we know are innocent are those the mafia kills. I'd like to make sure the mafia can't keep telling us "the person who isn't talking is innocent so you can trust his lack of advice." If we lynch inactives, then the mafia a) has to stay active themselves, giving us a record to analyze, and b) has to kill more active people, who can then help us identify the mafia later in the game with us knowing they're innocent.

**woad&fangs** · 01-07-2011, 06:15

vote: Jooray due to lack of kill.
Dang it! I wanted to vote Jesus! Looks like I'll have to settle for Aslan whenever I find him.
:hurls thunderbolts in a fit of rage:

**classical_hero** · 01-07-2011, 14:56

Originally Posted by autolycus

The reason why I want to lynch an inactive, classical_hero, is not so much about the possibility of them being mafia, but more, strange as it sounds, to prevent the mafia from killing them. Since this is a game where scum aren't revealed on death, the only people we know are innocent are those the mafia kills. I'd like to make sure the mafia can't keep telling us "the person who isn't talking is innocent so you can trust his lack of advice." If we lynch inactives, then the mafia a) has to stay active themselves, giving us a record to analyze, and b) has to kill more active people, who can then help us identify the mafia later in the game with us knowing they're innocent.

Fair enough, even though it does sound crazy. We are killing them to prove they are innocent, but i do understand what you are about.

So with that in mind I unvote, vote:Jooray