Fan-based map progression thread

[moonburn]

the boii and luigiones seem too big imho they´ll probably just start with 1 region (well maybe not the boii they where a powerfull confederation able to sack delphos but then again we don´t know much about their political unity )

also the arverni and eduii are probably in the same place (altough there´s that endless debate about how strong was the alliance beteween the eduii and that tribe of northern italy and if they should be included)

the lusitani and sabah and sweboz will not change so you can add that in

you might aswell also add in the eremus regions (including the one´s in pict territory)

ptolomaioi and seleukids and pontus and hai and saka and parthians and baktrians will probably not be changed so you can also include them already

and ofc \0 the arevaci don´t forget the arevaci

[Brennus]

Ooh how I long for the day when Normandy and Flanders are filled with a faction colour.

Diviciacus rides again!

[Moros]

the boii and luigiones seem too big imho they´ll probably just start with 1 region (well maybe not the boii they where a powerfull confederation able to sack delphos but then again we don´t know much about their political unity )

also the arverni and eduii are probably in the same place (altough there´s that endless debate about how strong was the alliance beteween the eduii and that tribe of northern italy and if they should be included)

the lusitani and sabah and sweboz will not change so you can add that in

you might aswell also add in the eremus regions (including the one´s in pict territory)

ptolomaioi and seleukids and pontus and hai and saka and parthians and baktrians will probably not be changed so you can also include them already

What makes you think we don't change any of those starting positions, province bounderies etc,...? Everything got redone from scratch and researched again, often by other people. So think they'd all remain the same is rather silly. Most factions will have rather big changes comming.

[fightermedic]

Most factions will have rather big changes comming.

you just won't stop teasing us eh?
cmon mr. moros leak us hungry folks some information ;)

[Moros]

you just won't stop teasing us eh?
cmon mr. moros leak us hungry folks some information ;)

As I'm only working on two factions I can't really list them. But assuming provinces, settlements, starting positions,... is madness. There's new material since research days of EB I, new members,... logically a lot has changed. Compare some of the previous previews with those from EB I. The pritanoi have probably changed more than most factions, but most have a lot of similar changes as well.

For example in Arabia, I think almost all settlements and provinces have new names. Some are changed for other settlements, almost all borders have changed as well. Most parts of the map had been changed quite a bit with extra provinces here, fewer there, settlements that got swapped or relocated,... Now Arabia and Brittain are more extreme cases, true.

@Quitus:
I'm not sure if you know what I'm referring to. Also a lot is secret because it's not ready, fully debated or researched yet. How can I tell you about for example the new sabaean ethnicities or how their buildings will be if we haven't worked them out yet. We try our best to make previews once in a while. Sure you could say we could at least say something like whihc factions are in. But when we do reveal a faction we want them presented in good way, one that is backed up by sources and research. We've got some fans who ask difficult questions sometimes and who don't want us to present them historically correct as well.

[moonburn]

i was just rambling moros :\

[QuintusSertorius]

I'm not sure if you know what I'm referring to. Also a lot is secret because it's not ready, fully debated or researched yet. How can I tell you about for example the new sabaean ethnicities or how their buildings will be if we haven't worked them out yet. We try our best to make previews once in a while. Sure you could say we could at least say something like whihc factions are in. But when we do reveal a faction we want them presented in good way, one that is backed up by sources and research. We've got some fans who ask difficult questions sometimes and who don't want us to present them historically correct as well.

I'm well aware of the team's standards of historicity, but there's a tension at work there. Confirming, for example, that there is a Numidian faction doesn't actually require the production of a completed, fully-researched preview. That's a lot of additional work that could be happening after it's merely said "yes, Numidia is one of the new factions". Assuming of course the research has reached a stage where the team are happy that it will indeed be included as a faction.

All I'm saying is that in the gap between confirmation and completion of a faction, little is lost by simply saying "look out for this faction, soon to appear in preview". What's gained is a moderation of interest at a certain level and management of expectations, rather than peaks and troughs of attention. With a timeframe as long as this, each of those troughs may result in numbers of people simply losing interest and not returning.

After all there's a long history of mods that never see light of day, with all the anticipation and excitement coming to nothing. I guess I should add as a pinch of salt, I'm someone who considers "surprise" to be worthless, so that colours my perspective.

[Foot]

After all there's a long history of mods that never see light of day, with all the anticipation and excitement coming to nothing. I guess I should add as a pinch of salt, I'm someone who considers "surprise" to be worthless, so that colours my perspective.

Others don't, and neither do we. If you aren't particularly interested in following EB, then you don't need to. Just keep an eye on the old Twitter, and when there is a release you will hear about it. We enjoy surprising our fans with previews of new content, and we enjoy watching them guess (and so much of the content of these forums is speculative conversations). This is how we've always run things, and there is no reason to change.

Foot

[QuintusSertorius]

Others don't, and neither do we. If you aren't particularly interested in following EB, then you don't need to. Just keep an eye on the old Twitter, and when there is a release you will hear about it. We enjoy surprising our fans with previews of new content, and we enjoy watching them guess (and so much of the content of these forums is speculative conversations). This is how we've always run things, and there is no reason to change.

Foot

That's about as categoric a refutation of my position as I could ask for! :)

Fair enough, it's your team and you know what motivates them best.