Quote Originally Posted by Askthepizzaguy View Post
Nice timing of course, but it seems that we also arrived at such a conclusion via speaking privately. Didn't even see your post until YLC pointed it out to me.

I kind of agree, because of the following best-case-I-can-think-of-day-one:

No one seemed to care if Winston or Seon got lynched, except Glenn. No one seemed to care if Cecil got lynched. Glenn's the only one who seems to be paying close attention to the first round voting, and who is getting lynched.

It might indicate apprehension.

I think tactically it's the better move. But really, this is still a shot in the dark.

unvote, vote: Glenn
I had time to think while I was away, and I want to come back to this post.

I am assuming that by "speaking privately" you mean, YLC and you. If not, please correct me.

If you are openly admitting private talks with YLC to lynch Glenn, that means you two are probably not both mafia, or that would giving away a big clue, so I am interested to know how this conversation started. Who talked first? Who suggested that Glenn is suspect?

I think that revealing this info is important because it could be an attempt to save the leading candidate (Cecil at the time), or it could be the mafia trying to manipulate the tally (YLC with 2 votes was getting scared maybe ). Anyway, we need more details before one of you two dies.

Quote Originally Posted by Askthepizzaguy View Post
You know it's really sad when caring about the game is a sign of scummery.

My opinion of townies in general is at an all-time low. Help me reverse that.
Well, I am not voting for Glenn because he's "caring about the game". You might be... but that's not how I understood your vote the first time. It seemed you were voting Glenn because he pushed WH ahead of the tally, thus appearing to care about who was being lynched (at the time, Cecil, who was tied at 2-2 with WH).

Caring about the game should never be a scum tell, or our games will turn into lurking crapshoots.