True that. Although keep in mind that the chief objective of every Roman politician was to gain glory and defend the state. Regardless of his lack of political skill, Maior was quite successful at both. I'd say he was better at it than Aemilianus, but that's just my opinion. -M
My Balloons:![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
The Roman system demonstrated time and again that though you had to exercise a military command to reach the highest offices, skill in politics mattered more than skill at generalship.
Look at exceptional generals like Sertorius, Lucullus and to a lesser degree Pompey (great organiser and administrator, rather average general) who failed in their aspirations because of their lesser political nous (or connections).
Then the sorts of military incompetents like Servilius Caepio who still managed high office and good regard amongst their fellow senatorials.
It began on seven hills - an EB 1.1 Romani AAR with historical house-rules (now ceased)
Heirs to Lysimachos - an EB 1.1 Epeiros-as-Pergamon AAR with semi-historical houserules (now ceased)
Philetairos' Gift - a second EB 1.1 Epeiros-as-Pergamon AAR
I agree in general, but I don't know if Caepio actually was a good politician. He was a member of the Servilii Caepiones, one of the most powerful and influential patrician family branches. Patronage played a huge role, and people from some families just seem to have rolled into high office barring extreme incompetence.
(This, supposedly, is actually why Caepio made such a mess at Arausio. He didn't want to cooperate with the new man Gnaeus Mallius Maximus.)
I agree in principle. I'm merely pointing out that Maior's accomplishments on the battlefield were perceived to be so extraordinary that not even his failings as a politician could prevent him from achieving near-legendary status in the eyes of later generations. -M
My Balloons:![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
It began on seven hills - an EB 1.1 Romani AAR with historical house-rules (now ceased)
Heirs to Lysimachos - an EB 1.1 Epeiros-as-Pergamon AAR with semi-historical houserules (now ceased)
Philetairos' Gift - a second EB 1.1 Epeiros-as-Pergamon AAR
Please do not be fooled by these impostors, for I am the greatest Africanus!
Seriously, I prefer the major simply because the future of the empire was more in doubt under the original. For all his great accomplishments, Rome remains a great power with or without minor, perhaps not so without major.
Simply and elegantly stated.
I've always gotten the impression though that Maior was held in higher esteem by people like Cicero as well, and he definitely would have had access to other sources. I could be reading too much into it though. -MWasn't that more because Polybius worked for Aemilianus (thus was complimentary of his ancestor Africanus), and his works happen to have survived (where others that might have been critical have not)?
My Balloons:![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Bookmarks