Results 1 to 15 of 15

Thread: The better Africanus

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1

    Default Re: The better Africanus

    Quote Originally Posted by Mulceber View Post
    Bad politician or not, I'd vote for Maior - he faced far more steep military opposition than Aemilianus. Also, I'd point out that there's some who'd call a lack of political craftiness a good thing. -M
    not for a roman ... a leader was a leader either in politics or in the batlefield they had to be complete overall

  2. #2
    CAIVS CAESAR Member Mulceber's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Ithaca, NY
    Posts
    548

    Default Re: The better Africanus

    True that. Although keep in mind that the chief objective of every Roman politician was to gain glory and defend the state. Regardless of his lack of political skill, Maior was quite successful at both. I'd say he was better at it than Aemilianus, but that's just my opinion. -M
    My Balloons:

  3. #3
    EBII Hod Carrier Member QuintusSertorius's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    23,510

    Default Re: The better Africanus

    The Roman system demonstrated time and again that though you had to exercise a military command to reach the highest offices, skill in politics mattered more than skill at generalship.

    Look at exceptional generals like Sertorius, Lucullus and to a lesser degree Pompey (great organiser and administrator, rather average general) who failed in their aspirations because of their lesser political nous (or connections).

    Then the sorts of military incompetents like Servilius Caepio who still managed high office and good regard amongst their fellow senatorials.
    It began on seven hills - an EB 1.1 Romani AAR with historical house-rules (now ceased)
    Heirs to Lysimachos - an EB 1.1 Epeiros-as-Pergamon AAR with semi-historical houserules (now ceased)
    Philetairos' Gift - a second EB 1.1 Epeiros-as-Pergamon AAR


  4. #4

    Default Re: The better Africanus

    I agree in general, but I don't know if Caepio actually was a good politician. He was a member of the Servilii Caepiones, one of the most powerful and influential patrician family branches. Patronage played a huge role, and people from some families just seem to have rolled into high office barring extreme incompetence.

    (This, supposedly, is actually why Caepio made such a mess at Arausio. He didn't want to cooperate with the new man Gnaeus Mallius Maximus.)

  5. #5
    CAIVS CAESAR Member Mulceber's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Ithaca, NY
    Posts
    548

    Default Re: The better Africanus

    Quote Originally Posted by QuintusSertorius View Post
    The Roman system demonstrated time and again that though you had to exercise a military command to reach the highest offices, skill in politics mattered more than skill at generalship.

    Look at exceptional generals like Sertorius, Lucullus and to a lesser degree Pompey (great organiser and administrator, rather average general) who failed in their aspirations because of their lesser political nous (or connections).

    Then the sorts of military incompetents like Servilius Caepio who still managed high office and good regard amongst their fellow senatorials.
    I agree in principle. I'm merely pointing out that Maior's accomplishments on the battlefield were perceived to be so extraordinary that not even his failings as a politician could prevent him from achieving near-legendary status in the eyes of later generations. -M
    My Balloons:

  6. #6
    EBII Hod Carrier Member QuintusSertorius's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    23,510

    Default Re: The better Africanus

    Quote Originally Posted by Mulceber View Post
    I agree in principle. I'm merely pointing out that Maior's accomplishments on the battlefield were perceived to be so extraordinary that not even his failings as a politician could prevent him from achieving near-legendary status in the eyes of later generations. -M
    Wasn't that more because Polybius worked for Aemilianus (thus was complimentary of his ancestor Africanus), and his works happen to have survived (where others that might have been critical have not)?
    It began on seven hills - an EB 1.1 Romani AAR with historical house-rules (now ceased)
    Heirs to Lysimachos - an EB 1.1 Epeiros-as-Pergamon AAR with semi-historical houserules (now ceased)
    Philetairos' Gift - a second EB 1.1 Epeiros-as-Pergamon AAR


  7. #7

    Default Re: The better Africanus

    Please do not be fooled by these impostors, for I am the greatest Africanus!

    Seriously, I prefer the major simply because the future of the empire was more in doubt under the original. For all his great accomplishments, Rome remains a great power with or without minor, perhaps not so without major.

  8. #8
    CAIVS CAESAR Member Mulceber's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Ithaca, NY
    Posts
    548

    Default Re: The better Africanus

    Quote Originally Posted by Africanus View Post
    Please do not be fooled by these impostors, for I am the greatest Africanus!

    Seriously, I prefer the major simply because the future of the empire was more in doubt under the original. For all his great accomplishments, Rome remains a great power with or without minor, perhaps not so without major.
    Simply and elegantly stated.

    Wasn't that more because Polybius worked for Aemilianus (thus was complimentary of his ancestor Africanus), and his works happen to have survived (where others that might have been critical have not)?
    I've always gotten the impression though that Maior was held in higher esteem by people like Cicero as well, and he definitely would have had access to other sources. I could be reading too much into it though. -M
    My Balloons:

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Single Sign On provided by vBSSO