Quote Originally Posted by Major Robert Dump View Post
Well, for example, when the terror plot against Fort Dix was busted, Olberman stated that it was overblown distraction from Bush's real problems because the terror plot would have never worked because Dix was full of soldiers with guns. In reality, Dix is a National Guard training hub where pretty much everyone except for a few civilian police are using M-16A2s with blanks as their training tools. Olberman made it sound as if the attack was against Fort Knox, when in reality some terrorists with real guns and real bullets could have killed scores of citizen-soldiers who had nothing more than dummy rounds and smoke grenades.

When this discrepency was pointed out by pundits from Fox News and USA Today-- and I am no fan of Fox News -- Olberman simply never replied. This is just one example.
1. Source please if you don't mind.
2. I don't take any sort of "discrepancy" pointed out by Fox News seriously, so please have the source come from USA Today if you don't mind.
3. Am I to believe that in a National Guard compound which also acts a critical mobilization point for reserve and National Guard troops and also contains "the largest single federal prison in America" that they would not have more than enough armament somewhere on that base or even collectively among all the soldiers who spent their time on the base to annihilate 6 men with anywhere from moderate to no training in firearms? I am sure that extreme professional terrorists who have been training for such a mission could do quite a bit of damage, but that wasn't exactly the case. Which is why I would like to read to hear Olbermann's words for myself to see where exactly he was coming from, instead from second hand, no offense to you.
4. How does this compare with allusions to Nazi's, Communism and Socialism coming from Glenn Beck?