Results 1 to 28 of 28

Thread: EB MP campaign

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Senior Member Senior Member Ibn-Khaldun's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Estonia
    Posts
    5,489
    Blog Entries
    4

    Default Re: EB MP campaign

    What I thought was using a map like the one below and editing for this game.
    Spoiler Alert, click show to read: 


    All the recruitment/movemen/etc will happen there but all the battles will be played as multiplayer battles using EB.

  2. #2
    Arrogant Ashigaru Moderator Ludens's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Posts
    9,063
    Blog Entries
    1

    Lightbulb Re: EB MP campaign

    That's the best way of doing it: the EB script does not work for hotseat games. I agree that for the first run a limited theatre is probably best. It's time-consuming to manage twenty factions and drop-outs are going to be a problem. I'd say five to seven factions are probably enough for a diverse game while still being easy to organize.

    Two things for you to consider: firstly, will factions be controlled by a team or a single person? The former will prevent drop-outs and will make large factions easier (if, say, the Seleucids get dogpiled it won't be one person that has to fight all the battles). Single-person is easier to organize, though. Secondly, how are you going to balance the factions, both on the strategic level and the battlefield? Obviously, you are not going to achieve a perfect balance, but the weaker factions should have a reasonable chance of winning, or at least holding out.
    Looking for a good read? Visit the Library!

  3. #3

    Default Re: EB MP campaign

    I'm interested in this as a matter of principle, but I'd like to know more details, especially about how strategic map movements and recruitment would be handled, but also regarding MP (what version of the game will be used, what, if anything, would one need to play mp, ways to insure that MP battles comply with what's on the strategic map etc.)

  4. #4
    Pincushioned Ashigaru Member Poulp''s Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Paris, France
    Posts
    464

    Default Re: EB MP campaign

    About the stage, I suggest Asia Minor and its surroundings. If you're playing in a limited area, that means you can swap a few unfeatured factions to better match factions in Asia Minor.

    Just imagine, pontic, ptolemees, seleucids, greeks, macedons wouldn't be the only ones clashing for control of the land; you can add gauls playing Galatians, epirotes for cilicians pirates, Bythnians, Pergameses... And Hayasdan and Sauromatae would be looming on the sides.

    The best would be to fill every provinces with a player faction and let diplomacy do its magic - while others enjoy the alliance bindings and back stabbings.

    Plus, such a campaign would be limited in time. A plus in my book.

    How unfortunate I won't be able to attend.


    ...

    on an utterly unrelated note, it has been a few months since I last posted or even lurked. Happy to see EB is still doing fine.

  5. #5
    Senior Member Senior Member Ibn-Khaldun's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Estonia
    Posts
    5,489
    Blog Entries
    4

    Default Re: EB MP campaign

    Quote Originally Posted by Ludens View Post
    That's the best way of doing it: the EB script does not work for hotseat games. I agree that for the first run a limited theatre is probably best. It's time-consuming to manage twenty factions and drop-outs are going to be a problem. I'd say five to seven factions are probably enough for a diverse game while still being easy to organize.

    Two things for you to consider: firstly, will factions be controlled by a team or a single person? The former will prevent drop-outs and will make large factions easier (if, say, the Seleucids get dogpiled it won't be one person that has to fight all the battles). Single-person is easier to organize, though. Secondly, how are you going to balance the factions, both on the strategic level and the battlefield? Obviously, you are not going to achieve a perfect balance, but the weaker factions should have a reasonable chance of winning, or at least holding out.
    1. Factions will be controlled by a team. However, each player will have his own army. Teams will decide the overall strategy on campaign map(whether someone should move/attack another province or just wait and defend the province his in etc).

    2. I proposed the First Syrian War and First Punic war because we can limit the number of factions to 2. Why so few? Firstly, I really don't want to start a game with more than 5-6 factions. Secondly, with only two factions it's a great test game. I think if it succeeds then there will be another one with more factions.

    3. It's easy to balance a game with just 2 factions.

    Quote Originally Posted by Drag0nUL
    I'm interested in this as a matter of principle, but I'd like to know more details, especially about how strategic map movements and recruitment would be handled, but also regarding MP (what version of the game will be used, what, if anything, would one need to play mp, ways to insure that MP battles comply with what's on the strategic map etc.)
    Each turn is divided into two sections: campaign and battle.
    First one, campaign part, will last 2 days. That is the time where people should discuss with their teammates what to do next. Then, orders for movement should be sent. You can move 1 province per turn.

    About recruitment.. Each player will start with 8-10 units. Each victory will give the player a chance to recruit another unit(when he uses that option is up to him). If player looses a battle he will loose the right for one unit(you had 10 units but lost then next turn you can have 9 units). Also, you can recruit a unit that is available for your faction in that province. All understrength similar units will be merged. This means you can merge your sphendonetai with toxotai and creat a new toxotai unit. However, you will loose some experience you had in the toxotai unit. But you can not merge prodromoi(cavalry) with thorakitai(heavy infantry).

    Since I'm not able to start anything like this before March then we have enough time to set out the correct rules. I'm currently trying to find a good but simple system for economy.

  6. #6
    Involuntary Gaesatae Member The Celtic Viking's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    In the heart of Hyperborea
    Posts
    2,962

    Default Re: EB MP campaign

    First of all, I'm in. Second of all... I'm in. That's all I have the energy to say right now, so I'll leave it at that. It's good to have a game of this type set in EB again.

  7. #7
    Peerless Senior Member johnhughthom's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Looking for the red blob of nothingness
    Posts
    6,344

    Default Re: EB MP campaign

    Perhaps another EB PBM might work better, it's been a while since the last one.

  8. #8
    Senior Member Senior Member Ibn-Khaldun's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Estonia
    Posts
    5,489
    Blog Entries
    4

    Default Re: EB MP campaign

    Well, but then MP battles can not be used. But, you are right, it's been a while since the last EB PBM was hosted.
    Anyway, this game will be played in Throne Room. Hopefully, it will promote EB multiplayer capabilities and bring more active people into these parts(Campus Martius and Throne Room) of the Org.

    And it's good to see some old faces here!

  9. #9

    Default Re: EB MP campaign

    I am interested. Not so much to play, as I am interested to observe and see how this works out.

    I believe it would be unfair for me to commit right now as I don't have much time for some sort of campaign. Hopefully you will document this campaign? I shall watch this thread and in the Throne Room.

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Single Sign On provided by vBSSO