It seems that action behind the scenes has exposed someone who has implicitly claimed mafia, or at the very least anti-town team.

Vote: Renata

S'cuse me but what do we have on reneta but reenks word?
From in thread, clearly the tone is that of "got nothing to lose" exposed mafia.

And ATPG said that, despite claiming something clearly anti town to Renata, in his own words:

I claimed to Renata that I was Charles Gunn, presumed pro-town innocent, but in reality the horned demonic worshiper of the apocalyptic hell goddess Glorificus; infiltrator of pro-town networks, dastardly murderer extraordinaire, friend of the Wolfram and Hart gang, willing participant in a conspiracy to destroy Buffy the Vampire Slayer, and willing to pretend to protect certain people while her gang finishes them off and recruits Angel into her hive of scum and villainy.

She claimed to me that she was Holland Manners, founding member of the "neutral" Wolfram and Hart gang, whose only enemies happen to be Angel Investigations, but she'd of course be willing to help me slay the Buffster. And, also, me being the mind-slave of a hell goddess was totally cool with her.

She later said publicly that I was "plausibly innocent". In the very post that Reenk's above quote was responding to.
When Reenk said:

You obviously know that Atpg claimed something quite not innocent to you and went on to kill 3 people, so why are you calling him innocent?