The Half Monty [Concluded]

[Zack]

Are you saying that Renata was wrong to vote you without a reason, but your vote against fluffy is fine, for saying he's a spammer? I don't understand how your vote is better. Like I pointed out to GE on day 1, placing a vote without a reason is at least equal (and arguably better), than giving a fluff reason. I understand that fluff reasons have a fun factor on Day 1, but we're Day 2 now.

It was just a snarky reply to GE saying "Let's try...", nothing more really. This is the real reason I'm still voting for fluffy.

[thefluffyone93]

You still missed the point of that comment.
IT WAS SARCASM.
YES I AM A SPAMMER NICE TO MEET YOU.

[Romanic]

Me, a spammer?
Oh, never in a million, billion years......
Amiright?

Immediate squirmy reaction.

I see that you haven't played in the last Council of Villains, or you would know Fluffy.

His reaction is something I'd expect from him, and I wouldn't rank it as "squirmy". Coming from Fluffy, that kind of stuff is a null-tell. Also, I don't think it's realistic to see someone scummy for a jokey reaction to your jokey vote.

As for the omgus vote, maybe. It's actually the only thing making sense in your case.

[Romanic]

vote: Khazaar

His last vote may be an attempt to swim under the radar. While everyone is talking about Zack/Fluffy, he's casually throwing a vote on slashandburn.

[Zack]

I see that you haven't played in the last Council of Villains, or you would know Fluffy.

His reaction is something I'd expect from him, and I wouldn't rank it as "squirmy". Coming from Fluffy, that kind of stuff is a null-tell. Also, I don't think it's realistic to see someone scummy for a jokey reaction to your jokey vote.

As for the omgus vote, maybe. It's actually the only thing making sense in your case.

There is nothing better to go off of than a bandwagonning OMGUS at this point in time.