The Half Monty [Concluded]

**thefluffyone93** · 02-09-2011, 23:20

Wait, pizza never specified if we can unvote or not.......
I see no reason for me to keep my vote zack simply
because he did not know about the way I post.

**pevergreen** · 02-09-2011, 23:44

Vote: Fluffy

Bleigh!

**God Emperor** · 02-09-2011, 23:57

Originally Posted by Romanic

Are you saying that Renata was wrong to vote you without a reason, but your vote against fluffy is fine, for saying he's a spammer? I don't understand how your vote is better. Like I pointed out to GE on day 1, placing a vote without a reason is at least equal (and arguably better), than giving a fluff reason. I understand that fluff reasons have a fun factor on Day 1, but we're Day 2 now.

I hope you noticed the joke in that post

Originally Posted by Nightbringer

Why exactly are we voting Zack? All I see is a nice little bandwagon starting to form. In the interest of avoiding that, I'll vote:god Emperor for telling people who to vote for without good reason.

What you see is a second vote on Zack.. that in itself should not be grand offense, imo. But the reason was quite simple.. as you noticed, I wrote that I wanted to see how a second vote is being handled by Zack and other parties. I don't think day 1 is enough to place good cases, at least I am not good enough to do that.. so giving another stab in the dark.. what I see is a Zack that get's extreemly jumpy as soon as he sees he is in the lead ; I may naturally be wrong

**Nightbringer** · 02-10-2011, 00:26

Originally Posted by God Emperor

I hope you noticed the joke in that post

What you see is a second vote on Zack.. that in itself should not be grand offense, imo. But the reason was quite simple.. as you noticed, I wrote that I wanted to see how a second vote is being handled by Zack and other parties. I don't think day 1 is enough to place good cases, at least I am not good enough to do that.. so giving another stab in the dark.. what I see is a Zack that get's extreemly jumpy as soon as he sees he is in the lead ; I may naturally be wrong

That sounds reasonable, but you could just as easily be scum just coming up with this to cover yourself in retrospect.
(edited for wording)

**Zack** · 02-10-2011, 01:02

Originally Posted by God Emperor

What you see is a second vote on Zack.. that in itself should not be grand offense, imo. But the reason was quite simple.. as you noticed, I wrote that I wanted to see how a second vote is being handled by Zack and other parties. I don't think day 1 is enough to place good cases, at least I am not good enough to do that.. so giving another stab in the dark.. what I see is a Zack that get's extreemly jumpy as soon as he sees he is in the lead ; I may naturally be wrong

"extremely jumpy"

**robbiecon** · 02-10-2011, 01:13

Well, might I just say that Grampa Simpson, Hans Moleman and Jasper Beardly could potentially be candidates for older people in this game, However, I am unaware if either Hans or Jasper were war vets. It is likely that Grampa Simpson is the only one of these three in this game, but one of the others could potentially be here, it really depends on askthepizzaguy's preferences.

**thefluffyone93** · 02-10-2011, 00:17

Originally Posted by pevergreen

Vote: Fluffy

Bleigh!

Oh....
OH THERE BETTER BE AN UNVOTE OPTION.
MUST SWITCH

**robbiecon** · 02-10-2011, 00:28

You better think twice before attacking Marjorie Simpson (nee Bouvier). I'll have my pan, and whatever else I can lay my hands on at the ready.

Now, I don't think Zack is the person who attacked me last night, but it's clear from my poor Bart being brutally picked upon yesterday that someone is out to kill us Simpsons.

So I'm gonna have to go with Vote: thefluffyone93