The Half Monty [Concluded]

**thefluffyone93** · 02-13-2011, 08:26

So....much....text....
But I think I got the gist of it.
Vote: Zack

That was the gist of it right?

**Death is yonder** · 02-13-2011, 08:32

And I do apologize that there is no tl;dr version, because this is ultimately as condensed as I can make it without the substance and link between the points disappearing

That was the gist of it right?

Kinda.

**Askthepizzaguy** · 02-13-2011, 08:37

Bah, I've made much bigger posts than that.

**Death is yonder** · 02-13-2011, 08:38

Bahhh its only Day 3

**slashandburn** · 02-13-2011, 08:51

Your reasoning was clear, I wouldn't have switched the votes if I had that power. IT means that Zack has a very high chance of being mafia, fluffy, very high but not absolute. So,
Vote:Zack

**Nightbringer** · 02-13-2011, 10:27

um, yah, what DIY said :D

But honestly, that made a lot of sense, and given the lack of much else to go on at this point, there really isn't much reason not to vote:zack
At the very least he will stop tying up all our attention.

On a side note, JHT, I think we would be better served by your contributing to the discussion than just voting Renata because of something about a lady and a lap.

**Renata** · 02-13-2011, 13:11

Well all righty, enough of that.

I'm Mayor Quimby, and the tie-breaking vote was mine. It was not a one-off; it will show up whenever I am part of a bandwagon that is tied with any other for the lead at the end of the day. (It will not *cause* a tie.) Hence why Khazaar got lynched; I was voting for him.

I was wondering who would be the first to portray this as an anti-town power and why; and who would conclude that it was NOT an anti-town power, and why. I won't reliably be around until this evening, so this is as far as I can let it run.

**Death is yonder** · 02-13-2011, 13:33

I was wondering who would be the first to portray this as an anti-town power and why; and who would conclude that it was NOT an anti-town power, and why. I won't reliably be around until this evening, so this is as far as I can let it run.

There was no precedent for this thus far, nobody could have known. I do not see why you phrase your above statement as such, as if trying to lower the credibility of my post, as if my post was a wild thought that escaped free and should be locked up and forgotten.

Anyway what's stopping you from being an anti-town role? Claiming Mayor Quimby hardly provides any insight into your alignment. If you've soft claimed your role and your abilities, show your full role. Right now the only people reaping the full benefits are the mafia, because they know your alignment and now they know your ability (if you're telling the truth in the first place). I also note that conveniently you have 12 more hours to prepare any defense of your role/faking a role pm. Since you're online now, do claim quickly, or you're not telling the truth and should be taken to be Zack's partner.

There is nothing to indicate your alignment as either town or anti-town. There is only inthread evidence that "Mayor Quimby" played around with the tally.

The write up was ambiguous, it could easily just have been an ability-wise vote manipulation as it could have been what you claim to be your ability.

In any case, I don't see why the case on Zack should be so off-hand discarded, and I'm extremely suspicious of the fact that you chose not to respond to several of my points indicating Zack's wishy washy lynch reasonings which were obviously not made to find a guilty party, but rather to incite the town against a particular individual (fluffy). Moreover, he, as evidenced by in thread posts, constantly edited his case on fluffy, if it could even be called a case, to fit townie public opinion, where I clearly mentioned in my post that he suited his reasoning merely to meet town expectations. **[Removed two words for ease in my meaning being conveyed]

Regardless of whether you are telling the truth or not Renata, why are you ignoring the substance in my post that remain strikes against Zack irregardless of your post? (Even assuming you are telling the whole truth).

Its day 3 and still early in the game, its a fairly decent lynch based on his in thread behavior regardless, and if its a wrong lynch the town is still strong. Lynch Zack, he has been twitchy and jumpy in thread, and his votes are clearly not attempts at trying to actually find suspects. I really don't see why this shouldn't be the case unless a better suspect can be brought up.

***Anyway, where's the role claim hmm? I remember in older mafia games they had a general saying that "Role-claim within 5 minutes or its fake" or something along those lines. I apologize if the grumpy tone of my post rubs you wrongly, but I did spend over an hour and a half making it not for it to just be discarded so in such a non-substantiated manner

*Edited for clarity [2minutes after actual post]
** Edited for greater clarity, and I note that Renata is STILL online. [10 minutes after post]
***Edited again [13 ish minutes after actual post]
**** And you went offline just like that, right. [16~ minutes after actual post]

**johnhughthom** · 02-13-2011, 14:01

Originally Posted by Nightbringer

On a side note, JHT, I think we would be better served by your contributing to the discussion than just voting Renata because of something about a lady and a lap.

Dr Hibbert said mommy fastened my diapers too tight when I was a baby and cut off the bleeding flying around my body. That's why I'm special. Moo.