Gay Parenting

[Rhyfelwyr]

Of course it is sexism. The sexes are different. Haven't you noticed?

No, you are forgetting that it only appears that way because scientists have an agenda to exaggerate gender differences.

For some reason, it is OK when liberals say that when presented with a scientific study, but when anyone else does it is is "anti-intellectual".

[Beirut]

No, you are forgetting that it only appears that way because scientists have an agenda to exaggerate gender differences.

Exaggerate gender differences?

They don't need to be exaggerated, they are different enough already.

[Sasaki Kojiro]

No, you are forgetting that it only appears that way because scientists have an agenda to exaggerate gender differences.

For some reason, it is OK when liberals say that when presented with a scientific study, but when anyone else does it is is "anti-intellectual".

Rhyf, gender is the social construct and used in contrast to biological sex differences. Everyone says there are big gender differences, but people who know something about history don't take them seriously, because there's nothing to stake a claim of legitimacy on (as if "natural" is a great place either, but that's another story) given how drastically they change with time and culture. Don't try and create smug straw men and misuse terminology at the same time

I'm fairly confidant that I've read much more than you have about the scientific study of it, so really you are just taking a page out of beirut's book here. In science the results and worth of studies are argued about. You are promoting bad science because you like the conclusion, and equating our reasoned disagreement with it to beirut's automatic rejection of science about which no methodological complaints have been raised so that you don't have to defend it.

[Beirut]

Rhyf, gender is the social construct and used in contrast to biological sex differences. Everyone says there are big gender differences, but people who know something about history don't take them seriously, because there's nothing to stake a claim of legitimacy on (as if "natural" is a great place either, but that's another story) given how drastically they change with time and culture. Don't try and create smug straw men and misuse terminology at the same time

I'm fairly confidant that I've read much more than you have about the scientific study of it, so really you are just taking a page out of beirut's book here. In science the results and worth of studies are argued about. You are promoting bad science because you like the conclusion, and equating our reasoned disagreement with it to beirut's automatic rejection of science about which no methodological complaints have been raised so that you don't have to defend it.

Ah, but sasaki, books and studies do not raise children - people do.

Less books, sasaki, more real life.

[Sasaki Kojiro]

Ah, but sasaki, books and studies do not raise children - people do.

Less books, sasaki, more real life.

Every post of yours has been "Nuh uh! ".

It's childish.

[Beirut]

Every post of yours has been "Nuh uh! ".

It's childish.

We are taling about children.