Gay Parenting

[Beirut]

That is not what you are saying though. You are saying they should have the child at the expense of a homosexual couple.

The homosexual couple have no rights. The heterosexual couples have no rights. Only the child has rights.

You didn't respond to the bigger issue. Our world is more artificial than that of the 1500s. Do you think we should be raised in a 1500s environment than a modern one? I know you are smarter than to feign ignorance on what makes this world more artificial than the one 500 years ago.

On the contrary, as we understand much more about the world and most people suffer less superstitions, I believe we are more connected with the world. For one thing, we don't think it is flat.

And why exactly is this "natural" way inherently better than having two loving dads or moms?

We live in nature, we as humans have a nature, and that said, in relation to the best interests of the child, natural would seem to be best.

My gf tells me the same thing. -high fives-

Sweet.

You didn't reply why my analogy was inaccurate.I am just saying that in this scenario, what you have suggested is prejudicial and makes gay parents be second class parents.

No, I never said gay parents were second class parents. I said as far as adoption goes, seeing that a child having a mom and dad is best, and I believe it is, then the child has a right to a mom and dad. And the child's rights outweigh the adoptive parent's rights by a factor of about a million to one.

Again and again: Parents do not have rights. They have obligations and responsibilities. The child has the rights.

May I ask if you have kids?