Exercise of the Tongue

[Vuk]

There was also a member named Vuk,
Who thinks that he's off the hook,
But we shall recall,
His brutish gall,
When he called Europe's armies crook.

How sweet, you wrote me a poem! *blushes*

[thefluffyone93]

I'm sorry to say I am
unable to think of an original one at the moment
so enjoy this instead.

There was a fisherman named Fisher
who fished for some fish in a fissure.
Till a fish with a grin,
pulled the fisherman in.
Now they're fishing the fissure for Fisher

[Motep]

What a day to see this thread...I had to make a tongue twister today...

Fickle Ickle picked pickles, harvest quickle with a sickle. Flickle Ickle tickled Fickle, Fickle countered with a tickle. But Flickle Ickle's never tickled, for she tickles ticklers with a kickle to fickle Fickle Ickle's back.

I think the one I wrote was better....but it is in a friend's notebook

[PershsNhpios]

Your twister is slightly unstable, Motep!

That is a marvellous one, Fluffy, it is one which I remember by heart - but it is unfortunately not lewd enough.

This is more suitable:

To Sadie the touch of a male meant,
An emotional cardiac ailment,
An acuteness of breath,
Caused her untimely death,
In the course of erotic impalement.

[Togakure]

Ah, a poet after mine own ... heart.

...

[steps back]

Hmm, upon re-read, that didn't sound quite right.

[thefluffyone93]

Now this is a funny one!
I present "Copyright Explained!"

When you write copy you have the right to copyright the copy you write. You can write good and copyright but copyright doesn't mean copy good - it might not be right good copy, right?

Now, writers of religious services write rite, and thus have the right to copyright the rite they write.

Conservatives write right copy, and have the right to copyright the right copy they write. A right wing cleric might write right rite, and have the right to copyright the right rite he has the right to write. His editor has the job of making the right rite copy right before the copyright would be right. Then it might be copy good copyright.

Should Thom Wright decide to write, then Wright might write right rite, which Wright has a right to copyright. Copying that rite would copy Wright's right rite, and thus violate copyright, so Wright would have the legal right to right the wrong. Right?

Legals write writs which is a right or not write writs right but all writs, copied or not, are writs that are copyright. Judges make writers write writs right.

Advertisers write copy which is copyright the copy writer's company, not the right of the writer to copyright. But the copy written is copyrighted as written, right?

Wrongfully copying a right writ, a right rite or copy is not right.