I know you are a fan of flammable arguments, but that comment is pure rhetoric on the grounds of "I pick the worse there is, and say it is good, because things are so bad!™ ".
Don't be silly, it detracts from what you are saying.
In the same vein, slippery slope arguments about government removing children from 'homophobic parents', will not be happening because it is completely unreasonable. Especially considering the socio-economical burden it would place on society, ensuring legal challenges and court battles, and an overhaul of the entire legal system and framework on the right of parents and bearing children.
Then again, what would happen to the poor child if they turn out to be homosexual ? These are factors that have to be carefully considered. The children in foster care are extremely vulnerable and at risk, they need unconditional love and attention to be able to lead a 'normal life'. Being put under strain or abandoned because of the 'adopted' parents belief would only complicate matters further.
It is not about saying "Homosexuality is good", it is about accepting the choice of the individual, and being there for them, even through difficult times.
Bookmarks