Paradox double crosses its enemies in an honourable and auspicious manner

**Alexander the Pretty Good** · 03-01-2011, 02:12

Originally Posted by lars573

Paradox makes games that are un-playable and a chore to slog through. They are no challenge to CA in anyway.

lol

Pretty pumped for more Paradox gaming on Clauswitz, and I like their tabasco for announcing this now. :D

**Motep** · 03-01-2011, 04:53

I am excited for this. Paradox has my love.

**Beskar** · 03-01-2011, 07:30

Is it a real game?

It is not even on the front of their blog or website.

**pevergreen** · 03-01-2011, 07:33

PI games are just so far beyond TW right now.

They don't have battle, but the campaigns CA try to put together against say a game of EU3? CA have nothing.

**al Roumi** · 03-01-2011, 16:39

Originally Posted by pevergreen

PI games are just so far beyond TW right now.

They don't have battle, but the campaigns CA try to put together against say a game of EU3? CA have nothing.

I absolutely agree. To my mind, the focus of gameplay in any TW campaign longer than 10 turns is always the campaign map. Battles, once I get my military/industrial complex running, are more of a formality. Only at the beginning of the game when the stakes are higher, resources more constrained and targets/threats more plentiful do I find battles particularly important or engaging. Later when I'm wielding multiple stacks of combined arms I'll enjoy the big battles but they can even be a bit of a grind.

The only thing I'll say against PI's clausewitz games in comparison to TW (bar the graphics) is the ping pong warfare.