Results 1 to 30 of 50

Thread: How mobile was the Macedonian phalanx?

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    EBII Hod Carrier Member QuintusSertorius's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    23,479

    Default Re: How mobile was the Macedonian phalanx?

    Quote Originally Posted by Ludens View Post
    I doubt the enemy would be so obliging as to wait while the pikemen were reassembling their sarrisa after the charge. So any charging pikeman would have to fight with a normal spear during combat. In which case, why didn't they simply front the phalanx with hoplites, who have a spear and a proper shield as well?
    I'm sure I read somewhere that the promachoi/front rank might be armed in the hoplite fashion. Can't for the life of me remember where I saw it, though.
    It began on seven hills - an EB 1.1 Romani AAR with historical house-rules (now ceased)
    Heirs to Lysimachos - an EB 1.1 Epeiros-as-Pergamon AAR with semi-historical houserules (now ceased)
    Philetairos' Gift - a second EB 1.1 Epeiros-as-Pergamon AAR


  2. #2

    Default Re: How mobile was the Macedonian phalanx?

    i read post this the other day and i thought to my self "I wanna try jog with a 4 meter long stick"... and I did so, and it worked... for 2 minutes, then i was exhausted

    but my assesment of the "running pikes" is YES:a well drilled formation with really endurant men can do it... but, it could turn into a game of mikado if they are not carefull... the teqhnique is for the guys in front row to use their right hand held relatively close to the counterweight, to push it down... and the rest is easy peasy...
    War is a puzzle with morphing pieces

    I make Ancient Weapons and Armor

  3. #3
    EBII Hod Carrier Member QuintusSertorius's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    23,479

    Default Re: How mobile was the Macedonian phalanx?

    Quote Originally Posted by The_Blacksmith View Post
    i read post this the other day and i thought to my self "I wanna try jog with a 4 meter long stick"... and I did so, and it worked... for 2 minutes, then i was exhausted

    but my assesment of the "running pikes" is YES:a well drilled formation with really endurant men can do it... but, it could turn into a game of mikado if they are not carefull... the teqhnique is for the guys in front row to use their right hand held relatively close to the counterweight, to push it down... and the rest is easy peasy...
    This is the thing, one guy could do it. But 256 trying to stay in formation?
    It began on seven hills - an EB 1.1 Romani AAR with historical house-rules (now ceased)
    Heirs to Lysimachos - an EB 1.1 Epeiros-as-Pergamon AAR with semi-historical houserules (now ceased)
    Philetairos' Gift - a second EB 1.1 Epeiros-as-Pergamon AAR


  4. #4
    Guest Member Populus Romanus's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    Seattle Suburbs
    Posts
    1,335

    Default Re: How mobile was the Macedonian phalanx?

    If they have been training at it for years, then yes, they probably could pull that off.

  5. #5

    Default Re: How mobile was the Macedonian phalanx?

    Quote Originally Posted by QuintusSertorius View Post
    This is the thing, one guy could do it. But 256 trying to stay in formation?
    If their profession is combat then i don't see it as unlikely. Not that professionals were really common i don't think

  6. #6
    JEBMMP Creator & AtB Maker Member jirisys's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    In the town where I was born.
    Posts
    1,388

    Default Re: How mobile was the Macedonian phalanx?

    Quote Originally Posted by QuintusSertorius View Post
    This is the thing, one guy could do it. But 256 trying to stay in formation?
    256 hundred you mean?

    Maybe 256 dozens, but you cannot part it that small or else it would be quasi-useless, I agree the lochagos can see to the few men he has under his command but remember this is not a manipular or cohortal army.

    ~Jirisys ()
    Spoiler Alert, click show to read: 
    Because we all need to compensate...

  7. #7
    EBII Hod Carrier Member QuintusSertorius's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    23,479

    Default Re: How mobile was the Macedonian phalanx?

    Quote Originally Posted by jirisys View Post
    256 hundred you mean?

    Maybe 256 dozens, but you cannot part it that small or else it would be quasi-useless, I agree the lochagos can see to the few men he has under his command but remember this is not a manipular or cohortal army.

    ~Jirisys ()
    No, I just meant one syntagma as the smallest possible tactical unit of the phalanx. If that small a number would struggle to do it, then a full taxeis or bigger would make it impossible.
    Last edited by QuintusSertorius; 03-11-2011 at 16:11.
    It began on seven hills - an EB 1.1 Romani AAR with historical house-rules (now ceased)
    Heirs to Lysimachos - an EB 1.1 Epeiros-as-Pergamon AAR with semi-historical houserules (now ceased)
    Philetairos' Gift - a second EB 1.1 Epeiros-as-Pergamon AAR


  8. #8
    Now sporting a classic avatar! Member fallen851's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Posts
    799

    Default Re: How mobile was the Macedonian phalanx?

    I actually read a good book on this topic.

    Anyway, the quick summary is that Alexander's Phalanx was highly mobile, and could change directions very quickly.

    After his death, phalanx formations became deeper, used longer spears and the soldiers had heavier armor. This meant they could easily overwhelm one of Alexander's formations in a head on fight and stood a better chance against elephants that became common in Sucessor Armies. However, they became increasingly immobile and unable to manuver. The result was that flank attacks were devastating, and soldiers often just fled when the threat of a flank attack occured, since their spears were so long and often were intertwined between the ranks of many of their peers in front of them that they had no way of turning to meet their enemy.

    So the answer is quite complex. Over time they became increasingly heavier armed and armored, because when one nation increases ranks and spear length, all nations have to, because the phalanx with the deeper ranks, longer spears and heavier armor wins in a head to head fight. The result is that this left them vulnerable in other areas, and made them a very one dimensional unit, which led to the rise of many types of support units that surrounded their flanks. So the answer is that it really depends on what period you are looking at the phalanx. The earlier you go, the more mobile the unit is.
    Last edited by fallen851; 03-11-2011 at 15:18.
    "It's true that when it's looked at isolated, Rome II is a good game... but every time I sit down to play it, every battle, through every turn, I see how Rome I was better. Not unanimously, but ultimately." - Dr. Sane

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L6eaBtzqqFA#t=1h15m33s

  9. #9
    EBII Hod Carrier Member QuintusSertorius's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    23,479

    Default Re: How mobile was the Macedonian phalanx?

    Interesting, so there was perhaps, as time went on, a move away from quality of training towards quality of equipment?
    It began on seven hills - an EB 1.1 Romani AAR with historical house-rules (now ceased)
    Heirs to Lysimachos - an EB 1.1 Epeiros-as-Pergamon AAR with semi-historical houserules (now ceased)
    Philetairos' Gift - a second EB 1.1 Epeiros-as-Pergamon AAR


Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Single Sign On provided by vBSSO