So, between Jason Blair and a few other high profile debacles lately, regulars of the backroom know I'm no big fan of the NY Times. In fact, I really believe people's support for it is because it's iconic stature as a left-leaning paper, not because of any quality, which apparently left sometime in the Clinton administration.
Well, just when i thought they couldn't sink any lower...
http://www.thedailybeast.com/cheat-s...d=cs:headline8
An 11 year old girl gets gang-raped by (count 'em) 18 guys in a small town in Texas. The NY Times position? 1) She was provocative 2) she asked for it 3) where were her parents.
Really... does anybody have a good word to say for the sanctimonious, felching bags of puss that are the NY Times editorial board anymore?
Or do you agree with them... when an 11 year old gets gang-raped by 18 guys, she clearly had it coming and... must have 'asked for it'.
Btw, I'm late to the DailyBeast crowd... me likey...
Bookmarks