ArmA II is the most realistic shooter I've come across, I don't find it overly challenging, requires much more thinking on your feet (or on your seat really). [/incidentally self-promotional message]
I also thought STALKER was quite easy, but dem bloodsuckers... *shudders* I'd take on a swarm of any other mutant any day rather than bumping into one of them at night - tough, invisible, fast, powerful, and just downright scary I'd tried shotguns, assault rifles, EVERYTHING i had on me, I'd always end up dead.
Bloodsuckers? Now those things, those were difficult.
But, as for me, I've narrowed it down to my three most difficult games.
Amnesia: The Dark Descent.
Steel Panthers - MBT.
Dwarf Fortress.
Love DF to bits, it's very, very err.... Fun. But I've never actually made a fortress last longer than 2-3 years (love modding it too).
Quote from myself: "okay, i think i'm ready to get my magma furnace up and running..." (less than one season later) ".... ahh nuts."
As for SP-MBT, i love the modern setting compared to WW2, but I can't for the life of me get the balance of units right. I always end up being far too infantry or armour heavy and miss out on some vital piece of equipment. Subsequently, I end up losing every match. I don't think I've ever actually finished a match successfully. Funnily, I like to think that I'm actually quite good at SP-WW2, I've been going strong in my current German long campaign.
Quote: "what are these ATGMs? why are they so damn powerful!? and why on earth are all my bloody T-90s on fire!!?"
Amnesia? Well, simply put, it just scared the pants off me.
err, you don't really want to hear a quote from me when I've been playing Amnesia - it's more or less just squeals and profanities. <_<
Bookmarks