Oh yeah that. It really stands out doesn't it
Oh yeah that. It really stands out doesn't it
Ah, and how many civilians killed due to retaliatory action in Iraq (which, incidentally, had nothing to do with Osama bin Laden)?More civilians were killed by Muslim extremists in two hours on September 11th than in the 36 years of sectarian conflict in Northern Ireland.....
This space intentionally left blank.
More civilians were killed in the USA in 2001 in car accidents than by terrorist attacks, too.Number of people killed when someone started sending Anthrax by mail in 2001 was about zero but it still ended up being significant 'cause you know it made people go hysteric faced with the prospect of flour or washing powder.
It's not how many people died in 9/11 that made the attack significant: it is that the USA/world felt it so keenly. By contrast the 7-7 bombers had much less lasting effect.
Last edited by Tellos Athenaios; 05-10-2011 at 18:10.
- Tellos Athenaios
CUF tool - XIDX - PACK tool - SD tool - EVT tool - EB Install Guide - How to track down loading CTD's - EB 1.1 Maps thread
“ὁ δ᾽ ἠλίθιος ὣσπερ πρόβατον βῆ βῆ λέγων βαδίζει” – Kratinos in Dionysalexandros.
Zero. There was no retaliatory attack to kill Muslims in Iraq.
(Save for some individuals, for example that guy from Wasilla who has just been sentenced by an American court to 24 years imprisonment for the murder of three Afghanis)
Iaqi deaths since 2003 are better compared to how many would've died under the brutal Saddam regime.
No? Weren't Iraq's supposed ties with al-Qaeda used to justify the invasion at least partially?Zero. There was no retaliatory attack to kill Muslims in Iraq.
Right, the same "brutal Saddam regime" that we thought was totally cool with murdering Kurds and Armenians and Iranians as long as they were at war with Iran, right? Right?Iaqi deaths since 2003 are better compared to how many would've died under the brutal Saddam regime.
This space intentionally left blank.
Now therein lies the rub.
When 'we' did business with Saddam, we were accused of supporting him. When we boycotted him, we were accused of starving a million Iraqi children to death.
When we did not attack Saddam, we were accused of not aiding the hundreds of thousands of Iraqi victims of Saddam. When we did attack him, we were accused of killing hundreds of thousands of Iraqi's in a retaliatory attack.
Can't win this. Damned if you do, damned if you don't.
They also believed that toppling a dictator was the right thing, the 'American' thing, to do. Silly Americans and their willingness to shed their blood to spread democracy.A majority of republican voters thought 911 was linked to Iraq even years after all facts were out. Eventhough it was clear the US were there to get those weapons of mass destruction.
So, two thumbs up.
Sadly many noble intentions were mobilised to a cause which was never free from more cynical motives.
Still, however that may be, Iraq was not a retaliatory attack. The retaliatory attack was last week in Abbottabad.
Last edited by Louis VI the Fat; 05-10-2011 at 23:18.
Few are born with it, even fewer know what to do with it.
We. We're in this together, people!You could have stopped selling him weapons and advanced technical hard/software - while letting food and medicine fly freely.
Now let's all sit in a circle and sing kumbaya.
This space intentionally left blank.
There, but for the grace of God, goes John Bradford
My aim, then, was to whip the rebels, to humble their pride, to follow them to their inmost recesses, and make them fear and dread us. Fear is the beginning of wisdom.
I am tired and sick of war. Its glory is all moonshine. It is only those who have neither fired a shot nor heard the shrieks and groans of the wounded who cry aloud for blood, for vengeance, for desolation.
America is not the only country on the planet. What's Europe ever done for the people of Iraq? Arms deals and oil contracts accompanied by hypocrite talk about the yanks, that's European policy.
Sweden does not grant the rest of the world the same treatment as it gives Swedes. Godwin's second law says that wherever there is a brutal dictatorship, there is a Swedish firm selling him whatever he requires:Originally Posted by Sweden, right now
Sweden is usually in the top five of the world's least corrupt nations when rated by Transparency International in its corruption perception index, but but Swedish companies do not receive the same positive rating.
The Swedish government has also been criticized by Transparency International for not doing enough to monitor Swedish companies abroad to make sure they follow both Swedish and international law.
http://sverigesradio.se/sida/artikel...rtikel=4150383
Last edited by Louis VI the Fat; 05-10-2011 at 23:27.
Few are born with it, even fewer know what to do with it.
Bookmarks