Koc, at the present, the not naming names policy is still in effect. Honestly, I hadn't thought much on it and didn't remember that we had spelled out that it was a no-no in the Org FAQs until reminded earlier today.

The problem has always been ironclad proof and if there is not good proof, it becomes a "he said/she said" kind of argument who's most probably result is a flame war. I know I (as a moderator) don't want to end up becoming some kind of judge presiding over evidence to determine if a thread needs to be closed, deleted or someone branded as a cheater and then dealing with the fall out of a someone not being happy about the decision. We've always tried to be neutral ground here and let politics happen elsewhere.

That's my take on things anyway.

BTW, thanks for opening a discussion for getting a clarification on this.