I mean, voting for the person who gets lynched every day (TLD), that takes some doing. Never doing it, or doing it only once, that'd be interesting. Does anyone fit that profile? Doing it 3 of 5 times is pretty near average -- and I'm still waiting on a scum motive for the vote change at the end of day one (which TLD also did).
I only pointed it out because I found it interesting.

AtPG able to change his vote at any time after putting Scienter into a tie? You have to be kidding me. Even ATPG gets lynched six ways from Sunday after doing something like that, followed by Scienter. That's not only lack of motive, that's negative motive. While not impossible they could be teammates and him bussing her there, your logic in trying to draw the connection is crazy.
Just pointing out a possibility, not a fact. Arguing about it is pointless though.

Voting a known innocent twice, as proven only last night with Chaotix' death? Do I smell a frame-up here, Csargo?
I don't understand why the time-frame matters. Does he become more or less innocent as time goes on? I've played enough to know that's not a good move.

Since when is voting together a scum tactic? Scum instinct is generally to avoid one another wherever practical, not the opposite. Other than Scienter, no one left alive has ever been in any danger of lynch, so other than Scienter, you'll have a hard time convincing me the scum would have really given a flying fig about any of the lynches and hence had motive to vote together anywhere (if both are still alive).
I didn't realize.

(It's not impossible he's mafia, but just this case only really serves to make me more suspicious of you.)
And now you know why I'm not ever serious.