Yes, that's the only logical conclusion a reasonable person could come to.But if the Second Amendment argument is to have validity, surely the correct response to Indiana's Supreme Court decision is for home-owners to gun down policemen the moment they step illegally on their porch? Let their case be made in court after the fact? Or is it being tacitly acknowledged that owning firearms is pointless when faced with the power of a state armed to the teeth?![]()
"Don't believe everything you read online."
-Abraham Lincoln
Bookmarks